Related Experiment Videos
A review of machine-guarding recommendations
1The Liberty Mutual Research Center For Safety and Health, 71 Frankland Road, Hopkinton, MA 01748, USA.
Applied Ergonomics
|April 1, 1995
Summary
Original machine-guarding recommendations from the 1940s were re-evaluated using modern anthropometric data. Many guidelines remain valid, but modifications are suggested to improve safety for all workers.
Area of Science:
- Industrial Safety
- Ergonomics
- Human Factors Engineering
Background:
- Machine-guarding standards were established in the 1940s based on limited anthropometric data.
- Subsequent comprehensive anthropometric surveys have not been used to validate these original recommendations.
- The changing demographics of the American workplace, including increased representation of women and minorities, necessitate updated safety standards.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the continued validity of 1940s machine-guarding recommendations against current anthropometric data.
- To identify necessary modifications to ensure safety for diverse populations, particularly women and minorities.
- To compare existing gap size and safe distance guidelines with contemporary human body measurements.
Main Methods:
- Data from six extensive anthropometric surveys were analyzed.
- Comparisons were made between existing machine-guarding drawings and current anthropometric data.
- Length dimensions were based on the 99th percentile male, and thickness dimensions on the 1st percentile female to minimize risk.
Main Results:
- Many of the original machine-guarding recommendations were found to be consistent with current anthropometric data.
- Several recommendations require modification to better reflect contemporary population measurements.
- Certain current dimensions lack correlation with incompressible joints and should be reconsidered.
Conclusions:
- Existing machine-guarding recommendations are largely valid but require updates for optimal safety.
- Proposed modifications aim to enhance protection for all workers, especially women and minorities.
- Eliminating dimensions not correlated with incompressible joints is recommended for improved industrial safety standards.