Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

The rationalisation movement in perspective and some ergonomic implications.

¹National Institute of Occupational Health, S-171 84 Solna, Sweden.

Applied Ergonomics

|April 1, 1996

Summary

This study reviews organizational rationalization strategies, finding early models like Taylorism offer poor ergonomics. Newer approaches show promise but lack ergonomic research.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Substitutional carbon doping of free-standing and Ru-supported BN sheets: a first-principles study.

Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal·2017

Same author

Root growth regulation and gravitropism in maize roots does not require the epidermis.

Planta·2013

Same author

The role of extracellular free-calcium gradients in gravitropic signalling in maize roots.

Planta·2013

Same author

Are we van der Waals ready?

Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal·2012

Same author

van der Waals bonding in layered compounds from advanced density-functional first-principles calculations.

Physical review letters·2012

Same author

Dynamical stabilization of the body centered cubic phase in lanthanum and thorium by phonon-phonon interaction.

Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal·2011

Area of Science:

Industrial Engineering
Ergonomics
Organizational Studies

Background:

The Rationalisation Movement has evolved significantly from early principles to modern organizational models.
Understanding the impact of these changes on worker well-being and efficiency is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

To provide an overview of the Rationalisation Movement, tracing its development from Taylorism to contemporary models.
To critically evaluate the ergonomic implications of various rationalization strategies.
To define key terms and concepts within organizational rationalization.

Main Methods:

Literature review and conceptual analysis of organizational theories.
Comparative assessment of historical and modern rationalization strategies.
Focus on ergonomic and work physiology perspectives.

Main Results:

Classical models like Taylorism, Fordism, and Lean Production demonstrate limited potential for positive ergonomic outcomes.
Emerging models such as Time Based Management and Business Process Reengineering present theoretically better ergonomic prospects.
There is a significant gap in empirical research concerning the actual ergonomic effects of recent organizational models.

Conclusions:

Traditional rationalization methods may negatively impact worker ergonomics.
Further research is essential to validate the ergonomic benefits of newer organizational strategies like Business Process Reengineering.
Integrating ergonomic considerations into the design of modern organizational models is critical for worker health and productivity.

Related Experiment Videos