Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

SAPS II revisited.

Philippe Aegerter1, Ariane Boumendil, Aurélia Retbi

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, Hôpital Ambroise Paré, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Boulogne, France.

Intensive Care Medicine
|January 29, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Human Development Index and outcomes in older critically ill patients: A European multicentre study.

Annals of intensive care·2026
Same author

Negotiating complexity in spite of scarce evidence-how to care for older ICU patients?

Intensive care medicine·2026
Same author

The impact of IPI risk factors on CAR T-cell therapy or allogeneic stem cell transplantation for treatment of relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL).

Bone marrow transplantation·2026
Same author

What every intensivist should know about the gray zone of ICU admission.

Journal of critical care·2026
Same author

Making the environmental case for digital education in intensive care.

Intensive care medicine·2026
Same author

Sex and 30-day mortality in elderly critically Ill adults: A frailty-adjusted multinational analysis with frequentist and bayesian estimates.

European journal of internal medicine·2026
Same journal

Publisher Correction: Current knowledge and challenges of sepsis-associated encephalopathy.

Intensive care medicine·2026
Same journal

Prehospital airway and ventilatory management: a collaborative and narrative review.

Intensive care medicine·2026
Same journal

Rapid coma with bilateral basal ganglia involvement.

Intensive care medicine·2026
Same journal

From size to function: moving beyond body mass index to frailty and central adiposity phenotypes.

Intensive care medicine·2026
Same journal

Effects of a clinical metagenomics intervention on clinical outcomes, healthcare costs, and health-related quality of life in patients with sepsis or septic shock: results of the randomized-controlled DigiSep trial.

Intensive care medicine·2026
Same journal

Hypercalcemia in intensive care unit: pathophysiological mechanisms and clinical implications.

Intensive care medicine·2026
See all related articles

An updated Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II) model was developed to evaluate Intensive Care Unit (ICU) performance. While the new model showed improved calibration for predicting in-hospital mortality, its discrimination was similar to the original SAPS II.

Area of Science:

  • Critical Care Medicine
  • Health Services Research
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • The Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II) is a widely used tool for assessing patient severity in Intensive Care Units (ICUs).
  • Evaluating and updating clinical performance metrics is crucial for improving ICU quality of care.
  • Existing performance evaluation tools may require refinement to account for evolving patient populations and care practices.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To construct and validate an updated version of the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II) for enhanced clinical performance evaluation of Intensive Care Units (ICUs).
  • To assess the utility of incorporating preadmission location and chronic comorbidity into the SAPS II model.
  • To compare the performance of the updated SAPS II models against the original SAPS II in predicting in-hospital mortality.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected multicenter data from 32 ICUs in the Paris area (Cub-Rea database).
  • Development of two logistic regression models based on SAPS II, with the second model including reevaluated SAPS II items, preadmission location, and chronic comorbidity.
  • Internal and external validation of the developed models using data from 33,471 patients treated between 1999 and 2000.

Main Results:

  • The updated SAPS II models demonstrated better calibration for predicting in-hospital mortality compared to the original SAPS II.
  • Model discrimination (area under ROC curve) was not significantly higher in the updated models (0.89) versus the original SAPS II (0.87).
  • Second-level customization and new items improved fit across patient categories, except for diagnosis-related groups, and altered the rank order of ICU performance.

Conclusions:

  • SAPS II derived models performed well overall, even with routinely gathered data in a community cohort.
  • A significant portion of outcome variation (one-half) remains unexplained by admission characteristics.
  • Uniformity of prediction across diagnostic subgroups was not achieved, and case-mix differences continue to limit direct comparisons of ICU quality of care.