Revascularization of the right coronary artery in bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting

Dmitry Pevni1, Gideon Uretzky, Paz Yosef

  • 1Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Tel-Aviv Sourasky, Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel. pevnid@yahoo.com

Insights

Bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) grafting for the right coronary artery (RCA) system showed similar early and midterm outcomes regardless of the graft used. Conduit choice for RCA revascularization did not significantly impact survival or angina recurrence in patients undergoing left-sided BITA grafting.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Surgery
  • Thoracic Surgery
  • Vascular Grafting

Background:

  • Bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) composite T-grafting allows right coronary artery (RCA) system revascularization using the right internal thoracic artery (RITA).
  • This study compares RITA grafting to other conduits for RCA revascularization in patients undergoing left-sided BITA grafting.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy of different conduits for right coronary artery (RCA) revascularization in patients undergoing left-sided bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) grafting.
  • To evaluate early and midterm outcomes, including mortality, complications, and angina recurrence, associated with various grafting strategies.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective analysis of 1000 consecutive patients undergoing left-sided BITA grafting from April 1996 to July 1999.
  • Patients were grouped based on RCA revascularization: free RITA (n=231), right gastroepiploic artery (RGEA) (n=246), saphenous vein graft (SVG) (n=142), or no graft (n=381).

Main Results:

  • Thirty-day mortality and perioperative complications were similar across all groups (RITA, RGEA, SVG, no-graft).
  • A trend towards higher complication rates was observed in the RITA group (10.3%) compared to RGEA (5.6%), SVG (4.9%), and no-graft (7.3%) groups (p=0.06).
  • Midterm follow-up (6-year survival and angina recurrence) showed no significant differences between the four groups.

Conclusions:

  • The choice of conduit for right coronary artery (RCA) grafting does not significantly affect early or midterm outcomes in patients undergoing left-sided bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) grafting.
  • All evaluated methods for RCA revascularization, including free RITA, RGEA, and SVG, demonstrated comparable long-term efficacy when used in conjunction with left-sided BITA grafting.
Abstract