Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 19, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
Published on: January 23, 2017
Different Gestalt processing for different actions? Comparing object-directed reaching and looking time measures
Peter M Vishton1, Elizabeth A Ware, Amy N Badger
1Psychology Department, College of William & Mary, Williamsburg, VA 23185, USA. vishton@wm.edu
Insights
Infants
Area of Science:
- Developmental Psychology
- Cognitive Science
- Infant Perception
Background:
- Infant motor behaviors like reaching and looking are crucial for learning.
- Gestalt principles guide how infants perceive objects and their motion.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how Gestalt processing influences infant reaching and looking behaviors.
- To compare the role of remembered motion and visual cues in infant object perception.
Main Methods:
- Six experiments were conducted with infants aged 6 to 9 months.
- Behaviors observed included reaching accuracy, timing, and visual attention (looking time).
- Stimuli varied in motion, visibility of gaps, and object features (shape, color).
Main Results:
- Remembered relative motion influenced infant reaching and looking.
- Infants required both motion and visible gaps for certain reaching behaviors.
- A dissociation was found between looking and reaching: looking was more influenced by memory than reaching.
- Reaching was less sensitive to separation cues and more influenced by object features like shape and color.
Conclusions:
- Gestalt processing in infants is distinct for looking and reaching behaviors.
- Infant reaching shows a lower weighting of separation cues compared to looking.
- Memory and visual properties play differential roles in guiding infant motor actions and attention.
Abstract:
Six experiments compared the Gestalt processing that mediates infant reaching and looking behaviors. Experiment 1 demonstrated that the positioning and timing of 8- and 9-month-olds' reaching was influenced by remembered relative motion. Experiment 2 suggested that a visible gap, without this relative motion, was not sufficient to produce these effects. Experiment 3 found that 6- and 7-month-olds required both remembered relative motion and a continuously visible gap to affect reaching; when two separate objects were placed adjacent to one another, they were treated as though they were connected. Experiments 4 and 5, using a looking time measure, identified a dissociation between looking and reaching performance. In Experiment 6, 6- and 7-month-olds' reaching was influenced when display parts differed in shape and color. In these experiments, Gestalt processing for looking was more influenced by remembered information than was Gestalt processing for reaching. For reaching, a low weighting of separation cues was also apparent.
More Related Videos
07:09Gaze in Action: Head-mounted Eye Tracking of Children's Dynamic Visual Attention During Naturalistic Behavior
Published on: November 14, 2018
07:36Eye Tracking During Visually Situated Language Comprehension: Flexibility and Limitations in Uncovering Visual Context Effects
Published on: November 30, 2018