Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Different Gestalt processing for different actions? Comparing object-directed reaching and looking time measures.

Peter M Vishton1, Elizabeth A Ware, Amy N Badger

  • 1Psychology Department, College of William & Mary, Williamsburg, VA 23185, USA. vishton@wm.edu

Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
|February 3, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Can Mimosa pudica Plants Enumerate Light Exposure Events?

Cognitive science·2025
Same author

Editorial: Emerging talents in human neuroscience: cognitive neuroscience 2023.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2024
Same author

Are Different Actions Mediated by Distinct Systems of Knowledge in Infancy?

Advances in child development and behavior·2018
Same author

Individual and developmental differences in preschoolers' categorization biases and vocabulary across tasks.

Journal of experimental child psychology·2016
Same author

Thoughts in space: the impact of environmental surround on cognitive processing.

Cognitive processing·2015
Same author

How preparation to touch or grasp alters visual size perception.

Cognitive processing·2015

Infants

Area of Science:

  • Developmental Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Infant Perception

Background:

  • Infant motor behaviors like reaching and looking are crucial for learning.
  • Gestalt principles guide how infants perceive objects and their motion.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how Gestalt processing influences infant reaching and looking behaviors.
  • To compare the role of remembered motion and visual cues in infant object perception.

Main Methods:

  • Six experiments were conducted with infants aged 6 to 9 months.
  • Behaviors observed included reaching accuracy, timing, and visual attention (looking time).
  • Stimuli varied in motion, visibility of gaps, and object features (shape, color).

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Remembered relative motion influenced infant reaching and looking.
  • Infants required both motion and visible gaps for certain reaching behaviors.
  • A dissociation was found between looking and reaching: looking was more influenced by memory than reaching.
  • Reaching was less sensitive to separation cues and more influenced by object features like shape and color.

Conclusions:

  • Gestalt processing in infants is distinct for looking and reaching behaviors.
  • Infant reaching shows a lower weighting of separation cues compared to looking.
  • Memory and visual properties play differential roles in guiding infant motor actions and attention.