Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Genetic insights into number of long-term conditions and their relationship with lifespan.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Dissecting the genetic and proteomic risk factors for delirium.

Nature aging·2025
Same author

Mendelian randomization study implicates inflammaging biomarkers in retinal vasculature, cardiovascular diseases, and longevity.

Science advances·2025
Same author

Identification and replication of sex-dimorphic protein quantitative trait loci across multiple ancestries and their associations with diseases.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

The future of polygenic risk scores in direct-to-consumer genomics.

Nature genetics·2025
Same author

Genetic score omics regression and multitrait meta-analysis detect widespread <i>cis</i>-regulatory effects shaping bovine complex traits.

PNAS nexus·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 1, 2026

Large-Scale Multi-Omics Genome-Wide Association Studies Mo-GWAS: Guidelines for Sample Preparation and Normalization
08:27

Large-Scale Multi-Omics Genome-Wide Association Studies Mo-GWAS: Guidelines for Sample Preparation and Normalization

Published on: July 27, 2021

4.7K

Mapping quantitative trait loci using linkage disequilibrium: marker- versus trait-based methods.

Albert Tenesa1, Peter M Visscher, Andrew D Carothers

  • 1School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, EH9 3JT, UK. albert.tenesa@ed.ac.uk

Behavior Genetics
|February 3, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

We compared two methods for mapping quantitative trait loci (QTL) using population linkage disequilibrium. The marker-based (MB) approach offers greater power than the trait-based (TB) approach, especially with multiple traits, reducing the need for simulations.

More Related Videos

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
05:53

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 21, 2018

10.5K
Combined Immunofluorescence and DNA FISH on 3D-preserved Interphase Nuclei to Study Changes in 3D Nuclear Organization
13:55

Combined Immunofluorescence and DNA FISH on 3D-preserved Interphase Nuclei to Study Changes in 3D Nuclear Organization

Published on: February 3, 2013

18.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 1, 2026

Large-Scale Multi-Omics Genome-Wide Association Studies Mo-GWAS: Guidelines for Sample Preparation and Normalization
08:27

Large-Scale Multi-Omics Genome-Wide Association Studies Mo-GWAS: Guidelines for Sample Preparation and Normalization

Published on: July 27, 2021

4.7K
Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
05:53

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 21, 2018

10.5K
Combined Immunofluorescence and DNA FISH on 3D-preserved Interphase Nuclei to Study Changes in 3D Nuclear Organization
13:55

Combined Immunofluorescence and DNA FISH on 3D-preserved Interphase Nuclei to Study Changes in 3D Nuclear Organization

Published on: February 3, 2013

18.9K

Area of Science:

  • Population Genetics
  • Quantitative Genetics
  • Genomic Analysis

Background:

  • Mapping quantitative trait loci (QTL) is crucial for understanding complex traits.
  • Linkage disequilibrium (LD) at the population level offers a powerful tool for QTL mapping.
  • Existing methods for LD-based QTL mapping have varying efficiencies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate and compare two distinct approaches for population-level LD-based QTL mapping: trait-based (TB) and marker-based (MB).
  • To quantitatively assess the statistical power of both TB and MB approaches.
  • To determine the conditions under which one approach outperforms the other.

Main Methods:

  • Trait-based (TB) approach: Compares marker allele/genotype frequencies in individuals from extreme trait distributions, using phenotypic information only for selection.
  • Marker-based (MB) approach: Compares quantitative trait values for marker genotypes in selected individuals, utilizing both allele frequencies and phenotypic values.
  • Mathematical quantification of the power of each method without extensive simulations.

Main Results:

  • The marker-based (MB) approach demonstrated equal or greater statistical power compared to the trait-based (TB) approach.
  • The power advantage of the MB approach is predicted to increase with a higher number of phenotyped traits.
  • The study provides accurate predictions, potentially reducing the necessity for complex simulation studies in QTL mapping.

Conclusions:

  • The marker-based (MB) approach is a more powerful and efficient method for population-level QTL mapping using linkage disequilibrium.
  • The MB approach's superiority is particularly evident when analyzing multiple quantitative traits.
  • This work offers a computationally efficient framework for QTL mapping, minimizing reliance on resource-intensive simulations.