Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Perforator flap breast reconstruction.

Eva Weiler-Mithoff1, Elaine L B Hodgson, Charles M Malata

  • 1West of Scotland Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Unit, Canniesburn Hospital, Glasgow, Scotland.

Breast Disease
|February 3, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Dermo-Glandular Suspension Following Wise-Pattern Explantation-Mastopexy: Is it Reaching the Intended Heights?

Aesthetic plastic surgery·2026
Same author

Blunt chest wall trauma as a precipitant of late peri-implant haematoma and implant rupture: a case report.

Journal of surgical case reports·2026
Same author

Transient peripheral neuropathy following autologous breast reconstruction: a case series and evidence-based protocol for risk reduction.

Journal of surgical case reports·2026
Same author

Torsion of a congenital human tail in a Japanese Infant: A case report.

JPRAS open·2026
Same author

Hemi-Y incision for nipple-sparing mastectomy with immediate implant reconstruction: 10-year outcomes from a single-center series.

JPRAS open·2026
Same author

Single-stage delayed hybrid reconstruction after failed implant-based breast surgery using the pedicled thoracodorsal artery perforator flap: a report of three cases.

Case reports in plastic surgery & hand surgery·2025
Same journal

Paget disease of the breast: An often-overlooked malignancy.

Breast disease·2026
Same journal

Retrospective analysis of survival of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer with microscopic residual invasive disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Breast disease·2025
Same journal

Association between AKT1 polymorphisms and susceptibility to breast cancer in the Iranian population.

Breast disease·2025
Same journal

Circulating tumor cells as a clinical, diagnostic, and prognostic biomarker in breast cancer.

Breast disease·2025
Same journal

Isolated breast myeloid sarcoma: A diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. A case report and literature review.

Breast disease·2025
Same journal

Imaging evaluation of nipple discharge: Review of literature and management considerations.

Breast disease·2025
See all related articles

Perforator flaps offer a revolutionary approach to breast reconstruction, sparing donor muscle function and reducing patient recovery time. While technically demanding, they present a superior alternative to traditional methods with promising future potential.

Area of Science:

  • Plastic Surgery
  • Microsurgery
  • Reconstructive Surgery

Background:

  • Perforator flaps utilize skin and fat from donor sites, nourished by myocutaneous perforators.
  • This technique spares donor muscle, preserving function and strength.
  • It has been successfully applied to various donor sites for autologous breast reconstruction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy and outcomes of perforator flap technique in autologous breast reconstruction.
  • To compare perforator flaps with conventional myocutaneous free flaps.
  • To discuss the evolving role and future potential of perforator flaps in reconstructive surgery.

Main Methods:

  • Review of established donor sites for perforator flap harvest (abdomen, buttock, back, thigh).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of technical demands, including meticulous perforator dissection and anatomical variations.
  • Comparison of clinical results with conventional free myocutaneous flaps regarding morbidity, pain, and hospital stay.

    • Main Results:

    • Perforator flaps significantly reduce donor site morbidity, postoperative pain, and hospital stay.
    • Despite technical challenges and longer operating times, clinical results do not support higher rates of fat necrosis or flap loss compared to conventional flaps.
    • Perforator flaps are considered a better alternative to free TRAM and gluteal flaps.

    Conclusions:

    • Perforator flap technique is a valuable advancement in microvascular free tissue transfer for breast reconstruction.
    • While requiring a learning curve and careful patient selection, it offers significant benefits over traditional methods.
    • Perforator flaps are poised to become the standard of care in free flap breast reconstruction.