Related Experiment Videos
Paradoxes of French accreditation
M-P Pomey1, P François, A-P Contandriopoulos
1Faculty of Management, University of Ottawa, 136 Jean-Jacques Lussier St, Ottawa, ON, K1N 6N5, Canada. pomey@management.uottawa.ca
Quality & Safety in Health Care
|February 5, 2005
Summary
The French healthcare accreditation system, mandatory since 1996, presents paradoxes. It can lead to compliance-focused behavior rather than genuine quality improvement and organizational development.
Area of Science:
- Healthcare Management
- Health Policy
Background:
- The French healthcare system implemented a mandatory accreditation system in 1996.
- This system involves an independent government agency, mandatory reporting of non-compliance, public summaries, and budget revisions based on reports.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the characteristics and paradoxes of the French healthcare accreditation system.
- To explore the implications of mandatory participation and resource allocation on quality improvement.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of the French healthcare accreditation system's five key characteristics.
- Identification and discussion of the paradoxes arising from the system's design and implementation.
Main Results:
- Mandatory accreditation can resemble an inspection, leading to strategic compliance rather than intrinsic quality enhancement.
- Linking accreditation reports to budget allocation may incentivize superficial adherence to standards, hindering organizational development.
- There's a risk of focusing solely on standardization and safety issues, neglecting broader quality improvement initiatives.
Conclusions:
- Accreditation systems must carefully consider government involvement and the link between accreditation and resource allocation.
- Future French accreditation could benefit from a more professionally driven approach and greater autonomy for quality improvement and organizational development.