Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Breast cancers: abnormalities visible on a single view].

J Stines1

  • 1Service de Radiodiagnostic, Centre Alexis-Vautrin, avenue de Bourgogne, 54511 Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy Cedex.

Journal De Radiologie
|February 5, 2005
PubMed
Summary

Radiologists should recognize unusual mammographic findings beyond masses or microcalcifications to prevent misdiagnosis of malignant lesions. Familiarity with subtle signs and complementary imaging aids accurate interpretation.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Impact of PACS implementation in a university center on radiology practice profile].

Journal de radiologie·2009
Same author

[Digital mammography: performance evaluation parameters and available systems in France].

Journal de radiologie·2007
Same author

[Breast imaging].

Journal de radiologie·2005
Same author

[Matching of mammary microcalcifications on images from different views].

Journal de radiologie·2005
Same author

The normal breast and its variations in mammography.

European journal of radiology·2005
Same author

[Breast cancers: abnormalities visible on a single view].

Journal de radiologie·2005

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Mammography is a key tool for breast cancer screening.
  • Certain malignant lesions present with atypical mammographic findings not fitting standard classifications.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and highlight unusual mammographic findings that can mimic benign conditions or be overlooked.
  • To emphasize the importance of recognizing these subtle signs for accurate diagnosis and patient management.

Main Methods:

  • Review of mammographic findings not classified as masses or clusters of microcalcifications.
  • Discussion of abnormalities visible on a single view, asymmetrical densities, and unusual patterns.
  • Emphasis on clinical correlation, technique, and comparison with prior studies.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Identified key unusual mammographic findings: single-view abnormalities, asymmetrical densities, and specific patterns (transparent, ductal, diffuse).
  • Highlighted the potential for misdiagnosis of malignant lesions presenting with these atypical signs.
  • Stressed the utility of clinical correlation, optimal technique, and prior film comparison.

Conclusions:

  • Familiarity with unusual mammographic manifestations of malignancy is crucial for radiologists.
  • Accurate interpretation of difficult cases relies on comprehensive assessment including clinical data and comparative imaging.
  • Advanced imaging modalities like ultrasound, MRI, and biopsy are valuable for definitive diagnosis in selected challenging cases.