Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Combining cues while avoiding perceptual conflicts.

Maarten A Hogervorst1, Eli Brenner

  • 1Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3UD, UK. hogervorst@tm.tno.nl

Perception
|February 8, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Detecting gaze shifts of moving observers in dynamic environments.

Behavior research methods·2026
Same author

Perceptual grouping can affect the online control of goal-directed hand movements.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same author

Evaluating lawful relationships in saccadic eye movements with simulated vision impairment: A proof-of-concept study.

Journal of vision·2026
Same author

Chromatic induction and retinal image motion.

Perception·2026
Same author

Very briefly hiding the hand impedes goal-directed arm movements.

Perception·2025
Same author

Can you learn not to respond to irrelevant motion while making fast arm movements?

PloS one·2025
Same journal

Predictive models and parameter analysis for multiple tactile perceptions in skin-wet fabrics interface.

Perception·2026
Same journal

Benchmarking spatial discrimination thresholds of two-frame motion defined forms compared to luminance and stereoscopic defined forms.

Perception·2026
Same journal

The effect of face masks on the perception of trustworthiness and competence in individuals with autistic traits.

Perception·2026
Same journal

The importance of external features for categorizing ethnicity: can Koreans identify Korean, Japanese, and Chinese faces?

Perception·2026
Same journal

Interoception, alexithymia, and motor congruency: Psychological drivers of body ownership in virtual reality.

Perception·2026
Same journal

Emotional valence, not arousal, influences taste perception.

Perception·2026
See all related articles

Information about discrepancies between sensory cues is largely preserved during cue combination. This finding suggests that the brain retains valuable data even when integrating multiple sensory inputs for a unified perception.

Area of Science:

  • Perceptual psychology
  • Computational neuroscience
  • Sensory integration

Background:

  • Cue combination models often assume discrepancies reflect limited individual cue resolution.
  • Accurate estimation of properties relies on effective integration of multiple sensory cues.
  • The fate of discrepancy information during cue combination remains an open question.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether information about discrepancies between sensory cues is lost during cue combination.
  • To test predictions of cue combination models with and without information loss.

Main Methods:

  • Participants combined visual cues (expansion, disparity, perspective) to estimate motion in depth and slant.
  • Experimental data on cue settings were compared with model predictions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis focused on patterns of cue usage and discrepancy handling.

    • Main Results:

    • Observed patterns in participants' cue settings closely matched models that do not assume a loss of discrepancy information.
    • Little evidence suggests that information about the discrepancies between cues is discarded during integration.

    Conclusions:

    • The brain appears to retain significant information about discrepancies between sensory cues during integration.
    • This suggests more sophisticated cue combination mechanisms than simple averaging or resolution-based models.