Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 19, 2026

How to Obtain Reliable Visual Event-related Potentials in Newborns
Published on: October 24, 2019
Detecting continuity violations in infancy: a new account and new evidence from covering and tube events
Su-hua Wang1, Renée Baillargeon, Sarah Paterson
1Department of Psychology, University of California, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA. suhua@ucsc.edu
Insights
Infants demonstrate early understanding of object continuity, but their ability to detect violations in occlusion and containment events develops later, with specific age-related successes observed.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Developmental Psychology
- Infant Perception
Background:
- Infants' understanding of object permanence and continuity is crucial for developing physical reasoning skills.
- Previous research shows varied abilities in detecting continuity violations in occlusion and containment events across different infant age groups.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate infants' abilities to detect continuity violations in occlusion and containment events using covers and tubes.
- To identify age-related differences in infants' detection of physical impossibilities.
Main Methods:
- Experiment 1: Observed 2.5- to 3-month-old infants' reactions to object-cover events with unexpected outcomes.
- Experiments 2 & 3: Assessed 9- to 11-month-old infants' responses to short cover-tall object scenarios.
- Experiment 4: Examined 9- to 13-month-old infants' reactions to tall object-short tube scenarios.
Main Results:
- 2.5- to 3-month-olds detected violations when an object disappeared under a sliding cover.
- 9- to 11-month-olds did not detect a short cover fully hiding a tall object; 12-month-olds did.
- 9- to 13-month-olds did not detect a tall object fully entering a short tube; 14-month-olds did.
Conclusions:
- Infants' ability to detect continuity violations in occlusion and containment events emerges gradually and is dependent on the specific event and age.
- The findings support a new account of infants' physical reasoning, highlighting developmental progression in understanding physical principles.
Abstract:
Recent research on infants' responses to occlusion and containment events indicates that, although some violations of the continuity principle are detected at an early age e.g. Aguiar, A., & Baillargeon, R. (1999). 2.5-month-old infants' reasoning about when objects should and should not be occluded. Cognitive Psychology 39, 116-157; Hespos, S. J., & Baillargeon, R. (2001). Knowledge about containment events in very young infants. Cognition 78, 207-245; Luo, Y., & Baillargeon, R. (in press). When the ordinary seems unexpected: Evidence for rule-based reasoning in young infants. Cognition; Wilcox, T., Nadel, L., & Rosser, R. (1996). Location memory in healthy preterm and full-term infants. Infant Behavior & Development 19, 309-323, others are not detected until much later e.g. Baillargeon, R., & DeVos, J. (1991). Object permanence in young infants: Further evidence. Child Development 62, 1227-1246; Hespos, S. J., & Baillargeon, R. (2001). Infants' knowledge about occlusion and containment events: A surprising discrepancy. Psychological Science 12, 140-147; Luo, Y., & Baillargeon, R. (2004). Infants' reasoning about events involving transparent occluders and containers. Manuscript in preparation; Wilcox, T. (1999). Object individuation: Infants' use of shape, size, pattern, and color. Cognition 72, 125-166. The present research focused on events involving covers or tubes, and brought to light additional examples of early and late successes in infants' ability to detect continuity violations. In Experiment 1, 2.5- to 3-month-old infants were surprised (1) when a cover was lowered over an object, slid to the right, and lifted to reveal no object; and (2) when a cover was lowered over an object, slid behind the left half of a screen, lifted above the screen, moved to the right, lowered behind the right half of the screen, slid past the screen, and finally lifted to reveal the object. In Experiments 2 and 3, 9- and 11-month-old infants were not surprised when a short cover was lowered over a tall object until it became fully hidden; only 12-month-old infants detected this violation. Finally, in Experiment 4, 9-, 12-, and 13-month-old infants were not surprised when a tall object was lowered inside a short tube until it became fully hidden; only 14-month-old infants detected this violation. A new account of infants' physical reasoning attempts to make sense of all of these results. New research directions suggested by the account are also discussed.
More Related Videos
06:07Exploring Infant Sensitivity to Visual Language using Eye Tracking and the Preferential Looking Paradigm
Published on: May 15, 2019
10:11Portable Intermodal Preferential Looking (IPL): Investigating Language Comprehension in Typically Developing Toddlers and Young Children with Autism
Published on: December 14, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Piaget's Stage 1 of Cognitive Development
Exploration...
Naturalistic Observations
The Nativist Approach