The two faces of typicality in category-based induction
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 19, 2026

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
Published on: June 3, 2013
Gregory L Murphy1, Brian H Ross
1Department of Psychology, New York University, 6 Washington Place, New York, NY 10003, USA. gregory.murphy@nyu.edu
Abstract:
Studies of category-based induction using different methods have found somewhat contradictory results for whether typical items are a stronger basis for induction. Typical category items are generally more similar to other category items than are atypical ones, and they are also more likely to be categorized into the category in question. We propose that the first aspect (representativeness) influences induction, but the second (uncertainty about the correct category) does not. Two experiments using artificial categories found support for this prediction. Two further experiments manipulated pictures of objects and also found that representativeness in the category influenced the strength of induction, but uncertainty of classification did not. Thus, the two aspects of typicality have different effects on category-based induction.
Related Concept Videos
Causes of Similarity-Dissimilarity Effect
The Representativeness Heuristic
Inductive Reasoning
Stereotype Content Model
Implicit Personality Theories
Typical Model Studies

