Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Anisotropy in an ambiguous kinetic depth effect.

J B Mulligan1

  • 1Aerospace Human Factors Research Division, Ames Research Center, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Moffett Field, California 94035.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and Image Science
|April 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sensory processing delays measured with the eye-movement correlogram.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2002
Same author

Image processing for improved eye-tracking accuracy.

Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc·1997
Same author

Application of M-JPEG compression hardware to dynamic stimulus production.

Spatial vision·1997
Same author

The barberplaid illusion: plaid motion is biased by elongated apertures.

Vision research·1996
Same author

Nonlinear combination rules and the perception of visual motion transparency.

Vision research·1993
Same author

Visual sensitivity to spatially sampled modulation in human observers.

Vision research·1991
Same journal

Phase retrieval with prior information.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science·2008
Same journal

Clinical microscopy of the cornea utilizing optical sectioning and a high-numerical-aperture objective.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science·1993
Same journal

Eye-tracking laser Doppler velocimeter stabilized in two dimensions: principle, design, and construction.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science·1993
Same journal

Effects of aging in retinal image quality.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science·1993
Same journal

Axial eye-length measurement by wavelength-shift interferometry.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science·1993
Same journal

Fractal analysis of steady-state-flicker visual evoked potentials: feasibility.

Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science·1993
See all related articles

Human perception of 3D shapes from motion is biased. This visual bias, where observers prefer certain 3D structures, is not fully explained by current computational models of motion processing.

Area of Science:

  • Visual perception
  • Computational neuroscience
  • 3D shape reconstruction

Background:

  • Ambiguous visual stimuli, such as Lissajous figures, can be perceived as two different 3D shapes undergoing rotation.
  • Human observers exhibit preferences for specific 3D interpretations, influenced by stimulus parameters.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate human biases in perceiving 3D shapes from ambiguous motion stimuli.
  • To evaluate the predictive power of computational models, specifically Hildreth's smoothest-velocity-field computation, in explaining these perceptual biases.
  • To explore the anisotropy in 3D shape perception by rotating stimuli.

Main Methods:

  • Presentation of animated Lissajous figures consistent with two distinct 3D rotating shapes.
  • Manipulation of stimulus parameters to identify biases in shape perception.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Application of an adapted Hildreth's smoothest-velocity-field computation for prediction.
  • Rotation of stimuli in the picture plane to assess anisotropy.

    • Main Results:

    • Human observers showed a preference for one of the two possible 3D shapes.
    • Hildreth's model provided fair predictions of perceived shape.
    • Stimulus rotation revealed anisotropy in perception, with a bias towards a vertical axis of rotation for certain figures.
    • This anisotropy was not predicted by the Hildreth model.

    Conclusions:

    • Perceptual biases in 3D shape interpretation exist and can be influenced by stimulus properties.
    • Current computational models may not fully capture the mechanisms underlying 3D structure interpretation from motion.
    • The aperture problem in 2D motion processing might be resolved after, not before, 3D structure interpretation.