Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Perceptible goals matter, but let's not overdo it!

Peter J Beek1, C Lieke E Peper

  • 1Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit, Van der Boechorststraat 9, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands. p_j_beek@fbw.vu.nl

Journal of Motor Behavior
|February 8, 2005
PubMed
Summary

This study critiques Mechsner's (2004) work on motor control, highlighting the need for clearer definitions and acknowledging neuromuscular factors. It addresses limitations in motor planning, execution, and learning based on empirical evidence.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A Comparison of Experimental Methods to Induce Mental Fatigue.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026
Same author

Classifying Soccer Players Based on Physical Capacities and Match-Specific Running Performance Using Machine Learning.

Journal of sports science & medicine·2025
Same author

Beyond Playing Positions: Categorizing Soccer Players Based on Match-Specific Running Performance Using Machine Learning.

Journal of sports science & medicine·2025
Same author

Learning the front crawl by observation: Comparing self- and other-models.

Human movement science·2025
Same author

Can the tumble turn performance be improved by aligning the push-off force vector to the centre of mass trajectory?

Journal of biomechanics·2025
Same author

Learning how to swim in 5- to 12-year-old children: a scoping review of evidence-based motor learning methods.

Frontiers in sports and active living·2025

Area of Science:

  • Motor control research
  • Cognitive neuroscience
  • Human movement science

Background:

  • F. Mechsner's (2004) imaginative experiments emphasized perceptual-cognitive factors in motor control.
  • A critical review of Mechsner's (2004) framework for understanding motor control processes.

Discussion:

  • Mechsner's account requires precise operational definitions for key concepts in motor planning.
  • The role of neuromuscular constraints and coordinative stability is overlooked in his model of motor execution.
  • Empirical and anecdotal evidence challenges Mechsner's perspective on motor learning.

Key Insights:

  • Perceptual-cognitive factors are crucial for motor control.
  • Operational definitions are needed for motor planning concepts.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Neuromuscular constraints and coordinative stability impact motor execution.
  • Mechsner's motor learning theory faces empirical challenges.

    • Outlook:

    • Future research should integrate operational definitions and neuromuscular factors into motor control models.
    • Further investigation into coordinative stability is necessary for a comprehensive understanding of motor execution.
    • Revising motor learning theories to align with empirical observations is essential.