Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Simple improved confidence intervals for comparing matched proportions.

Alan Agresti1, Yongyi Min

  • 1Department of Statistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611-8545, USA. aa@stat.ufl.edu

Statistics in Medicine
|February 8, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

How to navigate uncertainty in an unpredictable world.

Nature·2025
Same author

Data on SDGs are riddled with gaps. Citizens can help.

Nature·2024
Same author

Ordinal probability effect measures for group comparisons in multinomial cumulative link models.

Biometrics·2016
Same author

GEE for multinomial responses using a local odds ratios parameterization.

Biometrics·2013
Same author

Simultaneous confidence intervals for comparing binomial parameters.

Biometrics·2008
Same author

Modeling and inference for an ordinal effect size measure.

Statistics in medicine·2007
Same journal

Optimal Weighted Tests for Replication Studies and the 'Two-Trials Rule' With Multiple Hypotheses.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Identifiable Copula-Double-Cox Models: A Fully Parametric Framework for Dependent Right-Censored Survival Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Moving From Individualized Risk-Based Prevention to Benefit-Based Prevention: Estimating Individualized Life-Years Gained From Prevention Services as a Basis for Eligibility.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

A Mixture of Distributed Lag Non-Linear Models to Account for Spatially Heterogeneous Exposure-Lag-Response Associations.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Practical Considerations for Gaussian Process Modeling for Causal Inference in Quasi-Experimental Studies With Panel Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Covariate Adjustment for Wilcoxon Two Sample Statistic and Test.

Statistics in medicine·2026
See all related articles

This study improves interval estimation for comparing success probabilities in matched-pairs data. Simple adjustments to Wald confidence intervals enhance accuracy for the difference in probabilities and odds ratios.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Statistical Inference
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • Binary matched-pairs data is common in comparative studies.
  • Accurate interval estimation of success probabilities is crucial.
  • Existing Wald confidence intervals have limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose improved interval estimation methods for matched-pairs data.
  • To enhance the accuracy of confidence intervals for the difference of probabilities and odds ratios.

Main Methods:

  • Modification of Wald confidence intervals for the difference of probabilities by adding two observations to each sample.
  • Transformation of a confidence interval for a single proportion to improve odds ratio estimation.
  • Focus on binary outcome data in matched-pair designs.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The proposed method offers simple yet effective improvements over standard Wald intervals.
  • Enhanced accuracy in estimating the difference in success probabilities.
  • Improved confidence intervals for odds ratios in matched-pairs analyses.

Conclusions:

  • The suggested adjustments provide more reliable interval estimates for key comparative parameters.
  • These improved methods are valuable for analyzing binary matched-pairs data in research.
  • Facilitates more precise interpretation of treatment effects or group differences.