Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 19, 2026

Handheld Metal Detector Screening for Metallic Foreign Body Ingestion in Children
Published on: September 11, 2018
Screening for intimate-partner violence in the pediatric emergency department
Jonathan D Newman1, Karen M Sheehan, Elizabeth C Powell
1Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Northwestern University's Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Insights
Intimate-partner violence (IPV) affects 11% of mothers in pediatric emergency departments. Screening all women for IPV is recommended, as risk factors are not always clear. This approach is acceptable to patients.
Area of Science:
- Public Health
- Emergency Medicine
- Sociology
Background:
- Intimate-partner violence (IPV) is a significant public health issue.
- Pediatric emergency departments (EDs) serve a vulnerable population, including mothers seeking care for their children.
- Understanding the prevalence and risk factors for IPV in this setting is crucial for targeted interventions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the annual prevalence of IPV among mothers in an urban pediatric ED.
- To examine associations between IPV and socioeconomic factors, triage time, and child's diagnosis.
- To describe women's perceptions and preferences regarding IPV screening in the pediatric ED.
Main Methods:
- A confidential survey was administered to 451 unaccompanied women caretakers in a pediatric ED.
- Data collected included IPV experiences in the past year, socioeconomic characteristics, child's triage time, and diagnosis.
- Enrollment occurred during time blocks representing typical ED usage patterns.
Main Results:
- The annual prevalence of IPV was 11%.
- IPV was associated with race/ethnicity and lower educational attainment, but not poverty.
- Women reporting IPV were more likely to seek care in the evening; no association with child's diagnosis was found.
Conclusions:
- The prevalence of IPV in pediatric EDs is 11%, necessitating broad screening.
- Socioeconomic and visit characteristics are insufficient for identifying all women at risk.
- IPV screening in pediatric EDs is acceptable to women.
Objective:
The aims of this study were to determine the annual prevalence of intimate-partner violence (IPV) in an urban pediatric emergency department (ED) among mothers seeking care for their children, to examine the associations between IPV and family socioeconomic characteristics, triage time, and child's diagnosis, and to describe perceptions and preferences for IPV screening.
Methods:
A confidential 15-item survey was completed by 451 women caretakers who were unaccompanied by a male partner in an urban pediatric ED associated with a children's hospital. Women were enrolled during 4-hour time blocks selected to represent ED use patterns during June and July 2002. Survey questions addressed experiences of IPV (physical or sexual violence and perception of safety) in the preceding year and preferences for IPV screening. We also collected information about the women's socioeconomic characteristics and the child's triage time and diagnosis.
Results:
Fifty women reported IPV, an annual prevalence of 11%. Compared with white women, the relative risk of IPV among black women was 1.1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0-1.2) and among Hispanic women was 1.1 (95% CI, 1.0-1.2). Compared with women who completed college, the relative risk of women who had not completed high school was 5.8 (95% CI, 2.0-26.4). We observed no association with poverty. Women who reported IPV more often sought care for their child in the evening (4-12 pm, chi2, P < 0.01); there was no association with the child's diagnosis. Most (75%) stated that IPV screening in the pediatric ED was appropriate.
Conclusions:
The annual prevalence of IPV in a pediatric ED is 11%. As socioeconomic and visit characteristics are imprecise in identifying women at risk, screening should include all women. Screening for IPV in the pediatric ED is acceptable to women.
Related Concept Videos
Preventive Healthcare Services
Assessment of apical radial pulse
The A-R pulse assessment involves simultaneous evaluation of the apical and radial pulses. When the apical and radial pulse rates vary, this assessment helps identify a pulse deficit.
Pre-Procedural Preparation

