Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 15, 2026

High-throughput and Comprehensive Drug Surveillance Using Multisegment Injection-Capillary Electrophoresis-Mass Spectrometry
Published on: April 23, 2019
A tale of two jurisdictions. Can Australia and Canada learn from each other's experience with cannabis control?
1Department of Psychiatry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada. Stephen.Kisely@cdha.nshealth.ca
Objective:
To compare public health and legal policies to reduce the harm associated with cannabis use in Canada and Australia, given similarities between both countries.
Method:
A review of the epidemiological and health policy literature.
Results:
Although both countries have adopted harm minimization, a continued heavy reliance on legislative and punitive approaches in both Canada and Australia has failed to arrest the increase in cannabis use, especially among young people. A Senate inquiry in Canada has recommended the liberalization of laws on the possession and use of cannabis, while tightening legislation against operating vehicles or machinery while intoxicated.
Conclusions:
Existing policies are not evidence-based and lead to adverse outcomes such as criminalization of otherwise law-abiding citizens and diversion of resources from more effective policing or health service initiatives.
Related Concept Videos
Drug Regulation
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Cannabinoids
Two synthetic agonists of THC,...
Drug Control Governance: Regulatory Bodies and Their Impact
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions
An Overview of Psychoactive Drugs
Stimulants such as cocaine, amphetamines, and nicotine enhance brain activity, leading to increased alertness, attention, and energy. These drugs typically raise heart rate, blood pressure, and body temperature. While they can induce feelings of euphoria, their misuse can result in severe health...
Global Regulatory Systems

