Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 28, 2026

Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses
Published on: January 23, 2017
[Universal newborn hearing screening in Cantabria (Spain): results of the first two years]
A González de Aledo Linos1, C Bonilla Miera, C Morales Angulo
1Sección de Promoción y Educación para la Salud, Gobierno de Cantabria, Cantabria, Spain. gonzalezdealedo_a@gobcantabria.es
Aims:
We present the results of the first 2 years of universal newborn hearing screening in Cantabria.
Material And Methods:
We performed a descriptive study of screening with two levels of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions in 8,836 newborns, diagnostic confirmation with auditory brainstem response, and treatment.
Results:
The coverage of the first two levels of otoacoustic emissions was 98.4 % and 99.5 %. The incidence of risk factors was 3.08 %. A total of 6.7 % of those studied in the first stage were referred to the second, and 0.7 % of those studied in the second stage were referred to testing of auditory brainstem responses. Of the patents referred to the second stage, 97.6 % attended, and of those referred to the third stage 87.1 % attended. The positive predictive value after the second session of otoemissions was 7.9 %, and the false positive rate was 3.3 %. Sensorineural and bilateral hearing loss was diagnosed in 11 children, and permanent unilateral hypoacousia was diagnosed in one child, representing an incidence of 1.38/1,000 newborns. Sixty percent were diagnosed before the age of 3 months and 100 % before the age of 7 months. Fifty percent began treatment before the age of 6 months and 90 % before the age of 1 year. Of three cochlear implants indicated, two were implanted at 11 and 13 months. The cost was 1.3 3 per child screened and 867 3 for each case diagnosed.
Conclusions:
All the objectives of the first and second stages of screening were achieved. The continuity index anticipated for the third stage (87.1 vs 95 %) and access to treatment at 6 months (50 % vs 100 %) were less satisfactory, although these results compare favorably with those of previously published studies.

