Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 19, 2026

Postconditioning with Lactate-enriched Blood for Cardioprotection in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Published on: May 28, 2019
Evolving role of low-molecular-weight heparins in ST-elevation myocardial infarction
James S Kalus1, Lynette R Moser
1Department of Pharmacy Practice, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, 259 Mack Avenue, Detroit, MI 47201, USA.
Insights
Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) shows no benefit in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) without fibrinolysis. Enoxaparin is a viable alternative to unfractionated heparin (UFH) with fibrin-specific fibrinolytic therapy for STEMI patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a critical condition requiring prompt treatment.
- Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is an anticoagulant used in cardiovascular medicine.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of LMWH in STEMI patients.
- To compare LMWH with standard treatments like fibrinolytic therapy and conservative management.
Main Methods:
- A comprehensive literature search was conducted using MEDLINE (1966-March 2004).
- Keywords included myocardial infarction, STEMI, LMWH, enoxaparin, and dalteparin.
- All human trials involving LMWH for STEMI were reviewed.
Main Results:
- LMWH did not demonstrate benefits in STEMI cases managed without fibrinolytic therapy.
- Enoxaparin showed comparable outcomes to unfractionated heparin (UFH) with non-specific fibrinolysis.
- Enoxaparin reduced composite endpoints, mainly reinfarction, when used with fibrin-specific fibrinolysis compared to UFH.
- Bleeding rates with LMWH and fibrinolytic agents were similar to UFH.
Conclusions:
- Enoxaparin is a suitable alternative to UFH for STEMI patients receiving fibrin-specific fibrinolytic therapy.
- LMWH offers no advantage over standard care for STEMI patients on non-specific fibrinolysis or conservative management.
- Ongoing large clinical trials are expected to provide further definitive recommendations.
Objective:
To review the available literature on the efficacy and safety of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) in the treatment of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in patients treated with fibrinolytic therapy or conservative medical management.
Data Sources:
A MEDLINE search (1966-March 2004) using the key words myocardial infarction, STEMI, LMWH, enoxaparin, and dalteparin identified pertinent articles. The references of these articles were reviewed for additional pertinent references.
Study Selection And Data Extraction:
All human trials of LMWH in STEMI were evaluated. All pertinent studies were included in the review.
Data Synthesis:
LMWH did not show a benefit in STEMI without fibrinolytic therapy. Enoxaparin is similar to intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH) in combination with nonspecific fibrinolytic therapy with regard to invasive reperfusion markers and 30-day clinical outcomes. Enoxaparin decreases composite endpoints in combination with fibrin-specific fibrinolytic therapy compared with UFH, primarily through a reduction in the incidence of reinfarction at 30 days. Bleeding rates with LMWH in combination with fibrinolytic agents are not greater than those with UFH.
Conclusions:
Enoxaparin is a reasonable alternative to UFH in patients with STEMI treated with fibrin-specific fibrinolytic therapy. LMWH in patients managed with nonspecific fibrinolytic therapy or conservative medical treatment does not provide an advantage over standard management. Large clinical trials are ongoing which will provide more definitive recommendations.
Related Concept Videos
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Acute Coronary Syndrome IV: Interprofessional Care
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Myocarditis III: Medical Management
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
