Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 19, 2026

Lucifer Yellow - A Robust Paracellular Permeability Marker in a Cell Model of the Human Blood-brain Barrier
Published on: August 19, 2019
Lanthanum effect on the dynamics of tight junction opening and closing
1Department of Physiology and Biophysics, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. flacaz@usp.br
Abstract:
We present a comparative study in frog urinary bladders (FUB) and A6 cell monolayers (A6CM) on the effect of La3+ on tight junction (TJ) dynamics. These tissues react similarly to changes of basolateral Ca2+ (Ca(2+)bl), while responding differently to the action of La3+(bl). In FUB, La(3+)bl shows a Ca(2+)-antagonistic effect that promotes TJ opening in the presence of a normal Ca(2+)bl concentration. In A6CM, in contrast, La(3+)bl always shows a clear Ca(2+)-agonistic effect. The fact that a concentration of La(3+)bl one fifth of the normal Ca(2+)bl leads in FUB to TJ opening and in A6CM to a complete recovery of the TJ seal indicates a high affinity of La3+ for the Ca(2+)-binding sites in both tissues. In FUB, apical La3+ (La(3+)ap) exhibits, differently from its basolateral effect, an evident Ca(2+)-agonistic effect, suggesting a dual effect of La3+, depending on which side of the bladder La3+ is applied. In A6CM La(3+)ap has a Ca(2+)-agonistic effect similar to La(3+)bl. The effects of La(3+)bl in FUB and in A6CM are consistent, according to our previous publications, with La3+ acting antagonistically or agonistically, respectively, on the Ca2+ binding sites of zonula adhaerens. Despite the fact that the effect of La(3+)ap is clear in both tissues, its site of action is yet to be determined. Protonation of the Ca(2+)-binding sites causes a decrease of its agonistic effect on A6CM, consistent with a negatively charged binding site. In A6CM La3+ apparently replaces Ca2+, mimicking the effect of Ca2+ triggering the cascade of events leading to TJ closure. In FUB, La3+ interacts with the binding sites, dislodging Ca2+, with a high affinity, but this interaction is inadequate to initiate or sustain the process of junction closing. Possibly, the difference between the two preparations resides in subtle conformation differences of the outer segment of E-cadherin molecules.
More Related Videos
06:43Functional Assessment of Intestinal Tight Junction Barrier and Ion Permeability in Native Tissue by Ussing Chamber Technique
Published on: May 26, 2021
10:46Mechanical Stimulation-induced Calcium Wave Propagation in Cell Monolayers: The Example of Bovine Corneal Endothelial Cells
Published on: July 16, 2013
Related Concept Videos
Cell-matrix's Response to Mechanical Forces
Anchoring junctions mechanically attach a cell to the...
Tight Junctions
Tension Response at Adherens Junctions
α-Catenin as a Mechanosensory Protein
The α-catenin of adherens junctions is an allosteric protein with three VH (vinculin homology) domains...
Overview of Cell-Cell Junctions
Occluding or Tight Junctions
Tight...
Intracellular Signaling Affects Focal Adhesions
Some...
Overview of Cell-Matrix Interactions