Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

A linear mixed-effects calibration in qualifying experiments.

Jason J Z Liao1

  • 1Merck Research Laboratories, Merck & Co, Inc, West Point, Pennsylvania 19486, USA. jason_liao@merck.com

Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
|February 11, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Three steps toward dose optimization for oncology dose finding.

Contemporary clinical trials communications·2024
Same author

A gated group sequential design for seamless Phase II/III trial with subpopulation selection.

BMC medical research methodology·2023
Same author

A hybrid design for dose-finding oncology clinical trials.

International journal of cancer·2022
Same author

Mixture survival trees for cancer risk classification.

Lifetime data analysis·2022
Same author

Rejoinder to Letter to the Editor "The Hazards of Period Specific and Weighted Hazard Ratios".

Statistics in biopharmaceutical research·2021
Same author

Inferring latent heterogeneity using many feature variables supervised by survival outcome.

Statistics in medicine·2021
Same journal

Correction.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Leveraging external controls in clinical trials: estimands, estimation, assumptions.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Special issue of nonclinical statistics in regulatory applications guest editors' notes.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Comparison of flexible parametric modeling and nonparametric methods to estimate restricted mean survival time: A simulation study.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Simulated treatment comparisons with jackknife pseudo values for estimating population-adjusted marginal treatment effects.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Sample sizes for randomized controlled trials utilizing Bayesian response adaptive randomization for continuous outcomes.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

This study introduces a linear mixed-effects calibration model for experiment qualification, offering a superior alternative to traditional fixed-effects methods. Simulation results and a dataset analysis demonstrate its effectiveness in monitoring processes and ensuring experimental validity.

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Experimental Design
  • Calibration Modeling

Background:

  • Traditional fixed-effects calibration models are often inadequate for monitoring processes and validating experiments.
  • Control experiments require robust statistical methods to assess process stability and experimental integrity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and evaluate a linear mixed-effects calibration model for experiment qualification.
  • To compare the performance of maximum likelihood and restricted maximum likelihood estimation methods for control parameters.
  • To assess various confidence interval construction methods for improved control assessment.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a linear mixed-effects calibration model.
  • Application of maximum likelihood (ML) and restricted maximum likelihood (REML) estimation techniques.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Performance evaluation through simulation studies focusing on bias and mean squared error (MSE).
  • Comparison of five distinct confidence interval construction methods.
  • Validation using a real-world dataset.

    • Main Results:

    • The proposed linear mixed-effects model demonstrates advantages over traditional fixed-effects approaches for experiment qualification.
    • Simulation studies provide insights into the bias and MSE performance of ML and REML estimators.
    • Comparative analysis highlights the effectiveness of different confidence interval methods.

    Conclusions:

    • Linear mixed-effects models are appropriate and advantageous for experiment qualification, particularly in scenarios requiring robust process monitoring.
    • The proposed estimation and confidence interval methods offer reliable tools for assessing experimental validity.
    • The study underscores the practical benefits of employing mixed-effects models in scientific and industrial applications.