Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 19, 2026

Testing Acetylcholine Followed by Adenosine for Invasive Diagnosis of Coronary Vasomotor Disorders
Published on: February 3, 2021
Quantitative relation between hemodynamic changes during intravenous adenosine infusion and the magnitude of coronary
Rakesh K Mishra1, Sharmila Dorbala, Giridhar Logsetty
1Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Insights
Changes in heart rate and blood pressure during adenosine infusion do not reliably predict myocardial blood flow or coronary vascular resistance. These hemodynamic changes should not be used to assess vasodilator stress effectiveness in myocardial perfusion imaging.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Nuclear Medicine
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- The relationship between myocardial blood flow (MBF) and peripheral hemodynamic changes during adenosine infusion is not well understood.
- Assessing vasodilator stress effectiveness in myocardial perfusion imaging is crucial for accurate diagnosis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the correlation between changes in cardiac hemodynamics (heart rate and mean arterial pressure) and myocardial blood flow (MBF) during intravenous adenosine infusion.
- To determine if hemodynamic responses to adenosine can predict coronary vascular resistance (CVR).
Main Methods:
- 348 patients without obstructive coronary artery disease underwent [(13)N]ammonia Positron Emission Tomography (PET) imaging.
- MBF and CVR were measured at rest and during a 6-minute intravenous adenosine infusion.
- Changes in heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were recorded during peak hyperemia.
Main Results:
- Adenosine infusion increased HR and decreased MAP, but these changes showed poor correlation with hyperemic MBF and CVR.
- Patients with lower delta HR had significantly lower hyperemic MBF and higher CVR.
- Lower delta MAP (greater decline) was associated with similar hyperemic MBF and lower CVR, with no statistical significance.
Conclusions:
- Hemodynamic changes during adenosine infusion are generally poor predictors of MBF and CVR.
- These hemodynamic parameters should not be relied upon to assess vasodilator stress effectiveness in myocardial perfusion imaging.
Objectives:
The goal of this study was to determine the relationship between changes in cardiac hemodynamics during intravenous adenosine (ADO) infusion, and myocardial blood flow (MBF).
Background:
The relationship between changes in MBF and the peripheral hemodynamic effects during peak adenosine infusion is unknown.
Methods:
We studied 348 (age 57 +/- 11 years; 106 females) without evidence of obstructive coronary artery disease by positron emission tomography (PET). Patients underwent [(13)N]ammonia PET imaging to measure MBF and coronary vascular resistance (CVR) at rest and during a standard 6-min ADO infusion. Changes in heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were measured at baseline and during peak hyperemia.
Results:
During ADO, HR increased (delta: 24 +/- 11 beats/min) and MAP decreased (delta: -2 +/- 10 mm Hg). Overall, delta HR correlated poorly with hyperemic MBF (R = 0.10, p = 0.06) and with CVR (R = 0.11, p = 0.04). Delta MAP also showed a weak correlation with hyperemic MBF (R = 0.04, p = 0.44) and with CVR (R = 0.11, p = 0.04). Patients in the lowest tertile for delta HR showed a 7% lower hyperemic MBF (1.84 +/- 0.6 ml/min/g vs. 1.98 +/- 0.6 ml/min/g, p = 0.022) and an 8% higher CVR (54 +/- 20 mm Hg/ml/min/g vs. 50 +/- 17 mm Hg/ml/min/g, p = 0.056) compared with those in the highest tertile. Patients in the lowest tertile for delta MAP (i.e., greatest decline) showed similar hyperemic MBF, and an 8% lower CVR compared with those in the highest tertile (p = NS for both). These small differences between tertiles remain, even after adjusting for differences in age, gender, smoking status, and lipid profile.
Conclusions:
Changes in cardiac hemodynamics during intravenous ADO are generally poor predictors of changes in MBF and CVR during peak hyperemia, and, thus, they should not be used to assess the effectiveness of vasodilator stress in myocardial perfusion imaging.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Pathophysiology of Cardiac Performance
