Quantitative relation between hemodynamic changes during intravenous adenosine infusion and the magnitude of coronary

Rakesh K Mishra1, Sharmila Dorbala, Giridhar Logsetty

  • 1Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Insights

Changes in heart rate and blood pressure during adenosine infusion do not reliably predict myocardial blood flow or coronary vascular resistance. These hemodynamic changes should not be used to assess vasodilator stress effectiveness in myocardial perfusion imaging.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Nuclear Medicine
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • The relationship between myocardial blood flow (MBF) and peripheral hemodynamic changes during adenosine infusion is not well understood.
  • Assessing vasodilator stress effectiveness in myocardial perfusion imaging is crucial for accurate diagnosis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the correlation between changes in cardiac hemodynamics (heart rate and mean arterial pressure) and myocardial blood flow (MBF) during intravenous adenosine infusion.
  • To determine if hemodynamic responses to adenosine can predict coronary vascular resistance (CVR).

Main Methods:

  • 348 patients without obstructive coronary artery disease underwent [(13)N]ammonia Positron Emission Tomography (PET) imaging.
  • MBF and CVR were measured at rest and during a 6-minute intravenous adenosine infusion.
  • Changes in heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were recorded during peak hyperemia.

Main Results:

  • Adenosine infusion increased HR and decreased MAP, but these changes showed poor correlation with hyperemic MBF and CVR.
  • Patients with lower delta HR had significantly lower hyperemic MBF and higher CVR.
  • Lower delta MAP (greater decline) was associated with similar hyperemic MBF and lower CVR, with no statistical significance.

Conclusions:

  • Hemodynamic changes during adenosine infusion are generally poor predictors of MBF and CVR.
  • These hemodynamic parameters should not be relied upon to assess vasodilator stress effectiveness in myocardial perfusion imaging.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies01:30

Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies

Diagnosing acute coronary syndrome or ACS begins with a thorough patient history. Notable symptoms include central, crushing chest pain radiating to the left arm, neck, jaw, or back, along with shortness of breath, sweating (diaphoresis), nausea, vomiting, dizziness, and palpitations.It is crucial to note any history of cardiac illnesses and assess risk factors, including age, gender, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and a sedentary lifestyle.During physical examination, vital...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT01:28

Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT

Cardiac computed tomography (CT) scanning is an advanced cardiac imaging technique that utilizes CT technology, with or without intravenous (IV) contrast, to produce accurate cross-sectional virtual slices of specific areas of the heart, coronary circulation, and major blood vessels such as the aorta, pulmonary veins, and arteries. The computer processes these slices to generate three-dimensional images. Multidetector CT (MDCT) is a rapid form of CT scanning that captures multiple slices...
Pathophysiology of Cardiac Performance01:29

Pathophysiology of Cardiac Performance

Typical heart performance is influenced by heart rate, rhythm, myocardial contraction, and metabolism or blood flow. The cardiac muscle exhibits distinct electrophysiological features, including pacemaker activity and calcium channel control, which play a vital role in the heart's response to various drugs. The autonomic nervous system, comprising the sympathetic and parasympathetic branches, regulates heart rate. Sympathetic activation increases heart rate, while parasympathetic activation...