Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Prenatal testing guidelines: time for a new approach.

Miriam Kuppermann1, Mary E Norton

  • 1Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0856, USA. kuppermannnm@obgyn.ucsf.edu

Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation
|February 16, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Gene Panel Versus Whole Exome Sequencing for Fetal Anomalies.

Prenatal diagnosis·2026
Same author

Comparative Effect of Two Enhanced Prenatal Care Models on Care Experiences: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Obstetrics and gynecology·2026
Same author

A study of implementation fidelity to an adapted community-based model of enhanced group prenatal care.

Translational behavioral medicine·2026
Same author

Enhanced Prenatal Care Models and Postpartum Depression: The EMBRACE Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA network open·2026
Same author

Trends in antenatal corticosteroid use among late preterm twins and triplets in the United States following the Antenatal Late Preterm Steroids trial.

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology·2026
Same author

Comparative effectiveness of two enhanced prenatal care models on preterm birth: an exploratory analysis of the EMBRACE randomized trial.

American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM·2026
Same journal

Vaginal Estrogen for Urinary Tract Infection Prevention: A Narrative Review of Evidence, Guidelines, and Regulatory Gaps.

Gynecologic and obstetric investigation·2026
Same journal

Auxiliary data as surrogates for SCORE2 risk calculator inputs - design and methodology of the Frauenherzen study in apparently healthy women aged 40-69 years.

Gynecologic and obstetric investigation·2026
Same journal

Comparison of colpocleisis and long-term pessary therapy in the management of severe pelvic organ prolapse - A retrospective observational study.

Gynecologic and obstetric investigation·2026
Same journal

Société Suisse de Gynécologie et d'Obstétrique (SGGG) Congress Congrès annuel de Gynécologie Suisse.

Gynecologic and obstetric investigation·2026
Same journal

Comparative Study of DHEA vs. Femarelle® on Menopausal Systemic and Genitourinary Syndrome.

Gynecologic and obstetric investigation·2026
Same journal

The Role Of Dietary Supplements in The Management Of Endometriosis-Related Symptoms: Current Evidence Based on A Systematic Review Of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Gynecologic and obstetric investigation·2026
See all related articles

Current prenatal testing guidelines for invasive procedures like chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis may be outdated. Evidence suggests revisiting these guidelines to empower women in making informed decisions about fetal chromosomal testing based on personal values.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Genetics
  • Prenatal Diagnostics
  • Reproductive Health

Background:

  • Advances in prenatal testing offer more options for assessing fetal chromosomal status.
  • Current guidelines for invasive testing (chorionic villus sampling, amniocentesis) rely on risk-based thresholds, often linked to maternal age (e.g., 35 years).
  • Recent data challenge the assumptions underlying these traditional risk thresholds.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review evidence questioning current prenatal testing guidelines.
  • To advocate for a revision of guidelines concerning invasive prenatal diagnostic testing.
  • To support informed decision-making for pregnant women regarding invasive testing options.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review and evidence synthesis.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of data challenging current risk-based thresholds for invasive testing.
  • Examination of the ethical and practical implications of current versus revised guidelines.

    • Main Results:

    • Existing guidelines may not fully reflect current scientific understanding or patient preferences.
    • The risk-based threshold for offering invasive testing might be unnecessarily restrictive.
    • Women's values and preferences should be central to decisions about prenatal diagnostic procedures.

    Conclusions:

    • Prenatal testing guidelines, particularly the criteria for offering invasive procedures, require re-evaluation.
    • Empowering women with comprehensive information allows for personalized choices aligned with their values.
    • A shift towards patient-centered decision-making in prenatal diagnostics is recommended.