Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 19, 2026

Exploring Infant Sensitivity to Visual Language using Eye Tracking and the Preferential Looking Paradigm
Published on: May 15, 2019
Covert orienting to exogenous and endogenous cues in children with spina bifida
Maureen Dennis1, Kim Edelstein, Kim Copeland
1Brain and Behaviour Program, Department of Psychology, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, Ont. M5G 1X8, Canada. maureen.dennis@sickkids.ca
Insights
Children with spina bifida meningomyelocele and hydrocephalus (SBM) exhibit slower attention shifting and impaired disengagement. These covert orienting deficits correlate with specific brain abnormalities, including midbrain tectum beaking and posterior cortical thinning.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Developmental Psychology
- Pediatric Neurology
Background:
- Spina bifida meningomyelocele and hydrocephalus (SBM) is associated with congenital brain dysmorphies.
- Midbrain and posterior cortical regions are crucial for covert orienting.
- Children with SBM often display cognitive and attentional challenges.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate cued covert orienting abilities in children with SBM.
- To identify associations between orienting deficits and specific neuroanatomical abnormalities in SBM.
- To compare orienting performance in children with SBM to typically developing controls.
Main Methods:
- A cued covert orienting task was administered to 92 children with SBM and 40 typically developing controls.
- Three cue types were used: exogenous (luminance change), endogenous arrow, and endogenous word.
- Behavioral performance metrics (reaction time, cue-validity effect) were analyzed.
- Neuroimaging data (midbrain and posterior cortex morphology) were correlated with orienting performance.
Main Results:
- Children with SBM demonstrated significantly slower covert orienting responses to both exogenous and endogenous cues compared to controls.
- A greater attentional disengagement cost (cue-validity effect) was observed for exogenous cues in the SBM group.
- Covert orienting deficits were linked to midbrain dysmorphology (tectum beaking) and reduced right posterior brain volume.
Conclusions:
- Children with SBM exhibit significant deficits in cued covert orienting, impacting both orienting and attentional disengagement.
- These orienting impairments are associated with specific structural brain abnormalities, particularly in the midbrain and posterior cortex.
- Findings highlight the neural underpinnings of attention deficits in SBM and suggest potential targets for intervention.
Abstract:
Children with spina bifida meningomyelocele and hydrocephalus (SBM) have congenital dysmorphology of the midbrain and thinning of the posterior cortex, brain regions associated with the control of covert orienting. We studied cued covert orienting in 92 children with SBM, and 40 age-matched typically developing controls. Cues were of three types: exogenous (luminance change in a peripheral box either valid or invalid for upcoming target location), endogenous arrow (a central arrow either valid or invalid for upcoming target location), or endogenous word (a central word either valid or invalid for upcoming target location). Compared to controls, children with SBM showed slowed covert orienting to both exogenous and endogenous cues and a higher cost of attentional disengagement (e.g., a greater cue-validity effect) for exogenous although not for endogenous cues. Covert orienting deficits were associated with midbrain dysmorphology in the form of beaking of the tectum, and with right posterior brain volume loss.
Related Concept Videos
Non-Verbal Cues
The Nativist Approach
Learning Disabilities
Dyslexia
Dyslexia is a...

