Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2026

'Boden Food Plate': Novel Interactive Web-based Method for the Assessment of Dietary Intake
Published on: September 18, 2018
Local and national electronic databases in Norway demonstrate a varying degree of validity
C M Lofthus1, I Cappelen, E K Osnes
1Department of Medicine, Centre of Endocrinology, Aker University Hospital, N-0514 Oslo, Norway. c.m.lofthus@ioks.uio.no
Insights
Electronic databases for hip fractures show significant inaccuracies. Local registers underestimated by 46% and overestimated by up to 19%, while the national database overestimated by 19%.
Area of Science:
- Health Informatics
- Epidemiology
- Medical Record Analysis
Background:
- Electronic databases are crucial for epidemiological studies.
- Accurate data is essential for reliable health research and patient care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the validity of local and national electronic databases for hip fracture data.
- To compare electronic database accuracy against medical records as the gold standard.
Main Methods:
- Identified hospital admissions for hip fractures (ICD 9-code 820.X) over one year.
- Utilized hospital discharge registers and the Norwegian Patient Register.
- Verified diagnoses by retrieving and reviewing medical records and operating theater logs.
Main Results:
- One local electronic register underestimated hip fractures by 46%.
- Two other local registers overestimated hip fractures by 17% and 19%.
- The national electronic database showed an overall overestimation of 19%.
Conclusions:
- The validity of electronic databases for hip fracture data is questionable.
- Findings suggest potential inaccuracies in electronic health records impacting epidemiological research.
- Further validation of electronic health data is recommended.
Objective:
The aim of the present study was to examine the validity of local and national electronic databases using medical records as gold Standard.
Study Design And Setting:
All hospital admissions with ICD 9-code 820.X (hip fracture) in a 1-year period were identified in the electronic discharge registers of the hospitals in Oslo and in the national electronic database (The Norwegian Patient Register). Medical records for all patients identified by the discharge registers and the logbooks of the operating theater of the hospitals were retrieved, and the diagnosis was verified.
Results:
Compared with the total number of fractures confirmed in medical records, the electronic discharge register of one of the hospitals underestimated the number of fractures by 46%, whereas the two other overestimated the number by 17% and 19%. For the national electronic database, an overall overestimation of 19% was found.
Conclusion:
The present findings question the validity of electronic databases and thus have implications for epidemiologic studies.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Data Validation
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Data Validation
Key parameters for method validation include:

