Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Diagnosing depression: what's in a name?

Frank Buntinx1, Jan De Lepeleire, Jan Heyrman

  • 1Department of Gneral Practice, University of Leuven, B 3000 Leuven, Belgium. fank.buntinx@med.kuleuven.ac.be

The European Journal of General Practice
|February 23, 2005
PubMed
Summary

Differences in depression rates between general practice and questionnaire registries stem from conceptual and diagnostic objective variations, not just selection bias or diagnostic flaws. Understanding these distinctions is key to accurate depression prevalence data.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Performance of Non-Dental Professional Caregivers in Oral Health Assessment Using the Oral Health Screener: Caregiver-Dentist Agreement and Inter-Rater Reliability.

Gerodontology·2026
Same author

Management perceptions on oral health policies in nursing homes using the interRAI instrument: a SWOT analysis.

BMC geriatrics·2026
Same author

Screening oral health in older adults: accuracy of the Oral Health Screener for use within the interRAI.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Design and rationale of the ZORALCS study: An implementation study of lung cancer screening by low-dose computed tomography coupled to a smoking cessation randomized controlled trial in the Flemish region.

Journal of medical screening·2025
Same author

Insights Into Associations Between Oral and General Health Outcomes of Nursing Home Residents Based on InterRAI Data: Cross-Sectional Study.

JMIR aging·2025
Same author

Implementation of the OHS-interRAI for regular oral health assessments by non-dental caregivers: focus group study using a SWOT analysis.

BMC public health·2025

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Psychiatry
  • General Practice Research

Background:

  • Significant discrepancies exist in reported depression incidence and prevalence rates between general practice morbidity registries and questionnaire-based interview registries.
  • The study aimed to investigate the underlying reasons for these observed differences in depression statistics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and explain the factors contributing to the large, undeclared differences in depression rates reported by different registry types.
  • To differentiate between methodological and conceptual explanations for prevalence variations.

Main Methods:

  • A multidisciplinary group of clinicians and researchers engaged in literature-based discussions.
  • Analysis focused on comparing the nature of data collected and diagnostic approaches in general practice versus questionnaire-based systems.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Selection bias and diagnostic imperfections alone do not fully account for the observed rate differences.
  • Questionnaires capture factual patient situations but often lack detail on symptom intensity, coping strategies, or personal growth.
  • General practitioners (GPs) may view depression as part of a broader psychological issue, with diagnosis evolving progressively and serving to identify intervention needs.

Conclusions:

  • Conceptual differences in how depression is defined and the varying objectives of diagnostic processes are the primary drivers of discrepancies in occurrence rates.
  • The study highlights that general practice diagnoses depression as an emerging issue and coping mechanism, contrasting with questionnaires that may reflect latent personality traits.