Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Making human research safe: why we cannot afford to fail.

Marjorie A Speers1

  • 1Association for the Accreditation of Human Research Protection Programs (AAHRPP), 915 15th Street NW, Suite 400, Washington, DC 20005, USA. mspeers@aahrpp.org

Science and Engineering Ethics
|February 25, 2005
PubMed
Summary

Protecting research subjects is crucial. This keynote address introduces ethical considerations for safeguarding individuals in research, emphasizing intellectual property rights and patent law implications.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Correction to: Providing Patients with Critical or Life-Threatening Illnesses Access to Experimental Drug Therapy: A Guide to Clinical Trials and the US FDA Expanded Access Program.

Pharmaceutical medicine·2020
Same author

Providing Patients with Critical or Life-Threatening Illnesses Access to Experimental Drug Therapy: A Guide to Clinical Trials and the US FDA Expanded Access Program.

Pharmaceutical medicine·2020
Same author

Value of IRB in Expanded Access.

Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science·2018
Same author

Ethics Standards (HRPP) and Public Partnership (PARTAKE) to Address Clinical Research Concerns in India: Moving Toward Ethical, Responsible, Culturally Sensitive, and Community-Engaging Clinical Research.

Journal of clinical research & bioethics·2015
Same author

Practical solutions to challenges in research ethics proceedings of Bangalore conference.

Perspectives in clinical research·2013
Same author

Commentary: labeling institutional review board members does not lead to better protections for research participants.

Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges·2012

Area of Science:

  • Bioethics
  • Intellectual Property Law
  • Research Ethics

Background:

  • The ethical treatment of human participants in research is a cornerstone of scientific integrity.
  • Intellectual property rights and patent law present complex challenges in the context of research involving human subjects.
  • International conferences serve as vital platforms for discussing emerging ethical dilemmas in research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce the critical topic of protecting individuals participating in research.
  • To explore the intersection of intellectual property rights, patent law, and research subject protection.
  • To provide an foundational overview for a keynote address at an international ethics conference.

Main Methods:

  • Keynote address presentation.
Keywords:
Association for the Accreditation of Human Research Protection Programs (AAHRPP)Biomedical and Behavioral ResearchLegal Approach

Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of ethical principles in human subject research.
  • Discussion of intellectual property and patent law frameworks.

    • Main Results:

    • Highlighted the importance of ethical considerations for research participants.
    • Introduced the complexities of intellectual property rights and patents in research.
    • Set the stage for in-depth discussions on safeguarding research subjects.

    Conclusions:

    • Emphasized the need for robust ethical guidelines to protect research participants.
    • Underscored the significance of addressing intellectual property and patent issues in research ethics.
    • Called for continued dialogue on the ethical responsibilities in scientific research.