Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The immoral gene: does it really exist?

Franz-Josef Zimmer1, Svenja Sethmann

  • 1Grünecker, Kinkeldey, Stockmair & Schwanhäusser, Law Firm, Munich, Germany. zimmer@grunecker.de

Science and Engineering Ethics
|February 25, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Recent Decisions of the European Court of Justice of the European Union on Supplementary Protection Certificates: A Few Answers-Many Questions.

Biotechnology law report·2014
Same journal

Not Another Grocery List: Proposals for an Effective AI Ethics Implementation.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

From Biopiracy to Sustainable Knowledge Governance: Epistemic Justice and the Reconstruction of Resource Sovereignty in the Global South.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Deliberative Lab Communication and the Practice of Ethical Science.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Graduate Students Find Content of Responsible Conduct of Research Coursework Useful.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Discursive Ethics as a Normative Foundation for Integrating Ethics into AI Clinical Decision Support Systems.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Tragedies of Technology: An Exploration of Such Narratives.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
See all related articles

European patents face opposition due to morality concerns under Article 53(a) EPC. Recent discussions focus on stem cell patentability, a key issue in biotechnological inventions.

Area of Science:

  • Biotechnology Law
  • Intellectual Property Rights
  • Bioethics

Background:

  • European patents have been increasingly opposed based on the morality requirement of Article 53(a) of the European Patent Convention (EPC).
  • The European Patent Office (EPO) and amendments to the Implementing Regulations have sought to clarify this patentability criterion.
  • The patentability of stem cells has emerged as a significant and ongoing debate in this area.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the trend of patent oppositions concerning the morality requirement under Article 53(a) EPC.
  • To examine the EPO's and legislative efforts to refine the application of the morality requirement.
  • To highlight the contentious issue of stem cell patentability within biotechnological inventions.

Main Methods:

Keywords:
Biomedical and Behavioral ResearchEuropean Patent ConventionGenetics and ReproductionLegal Approach

Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of European patent oppositions related to Article 53(a) EPC.
  • Analysis of decisions from EPO Appeal Boards.
  • Examination of amendments to the Implementing Regulations of the EPC.
  • Identification and discussion of recent case law concerning stem cells.

    • Main Results:

    • Several European patents have faced opposition due to violations of the morality requirement.
    • Ongoing efforts by the EPO and legislative changes aim to provide clearer guidelines on patentability.
    • Stem cell patentability remains a focal point of discussion and legal challenges.

    Conclusions:

    • The morality requirement under Article 53(a) EPC is a critical factor in patentability, particularly for biotechnological inventions.
    • The EPO is actively refining its approach to this requirement through case law and regulatory amendments.
    • The patentability of stem cells will likely continue to be a significant legal and ethical debate for the foreseeable future.