Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Interpretive methodology: some problems, limitations, and remedial strategies.

P Rubovits-Seitz1

  • 1George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, D.C.

Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association
|January 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary

Clinical interpretation is prone to errors due to methodological flaws. This study reviews these issues and proposes strategies for error detection, correction, and validation to improve interpretive accuracy.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The fallibility of interpretations.

Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association·1994
Same author

Kohut's method of interpretation: a critique.

Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association·1988
Same author

Another report of anniversary reactions.

The American journal of psychiatry·1983
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Medical Diagnostics
  • Clinical Pathology
  • Healthcare Quality Improvement

Background:

  • Clinical interpretation is inherently complex and susceptible to errors.
  • Methodological limitations in interpretive processes can lead to inevitable mistakes.
  • Ensuring accuracy in clinical decision-making is paramount for patient safety.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review the major problems and limitations in clinical interpretive methodology.
  • To describe strategies for mitigating errors in clinical interpretation.
  • To introduce the concept of "learning from error" in a clinical context.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on interpretive methodology.
  • Analysis of common sources of error in clinical interpretation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Description of error-detecting, error-correcting, and validating procedures.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified fundamental methodologic problems causing errors in clinical interpretation.
    • Outlined specific strategies for "learning from error" to enhance accuracy.
    • Emphasized the importance of systematic procedures for validation.

    Conclusions:

    • Clinical interpretation requires robust methodologies to minimize inherent fallibility.
    • Implementing error-detecting, error-correcting, and validating procedures can significantly improve interpretive reliability.
    • A systematic approach to learning from errors is crucial for advancing clinical practice.