Fixed-interval performance and self-control in children
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 8, 2026

Making Sense of Listening: The IMAP Test Battery
Published on: October 11, 2010
J C Darcheville1, V Rivière, J H Wearden
1Université Charles de Gaulle, Lille.
Insights
Children
Area of Science:
- Behavioral Psychology
- Child Development
Background:
- Operant conditioning principles are fundamental to understanding behavior.
- Self-control and impulsivity in children are critical areas of developmental research.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the relationship between choice behavior in a self-control paradigm and performance on fixed-interval schedules in children.
- To explore individual differences in delay discounting and reinforcement schedules.
Main Methods:
- 16 children (mean age 6 years) participated in operant conditioning tasks.
- Fixed-interval schedules with varying reinforcer durations and intervals were used.
- A self-control paradigm involved choices between immediate and delayed cartoon reinforcers of varying durations.
Main Results:
- Individual differences in self-control choices predicted fixed-interval performance.
- Children choosing immediate, smaller reinforcers (impulsive) showed high, stable response rates and short postreinforcement pauses.
- Children choosing larger, delayed reinforcers (self-controlled) exhibited lower, systematically varying response rates and long postreinforcement pauses.
Conclusions:
- Behavioral patterns in self-control choices directly correlate with performance under fixed-interval schedules in children.
- This study highlights the predictive power of self-control paradigms for understanding operant behavior in young children.
Abstract:
Operant responses of 16 children (mean age 6 years and 1 month) were reinforced according to different fixed-interval schedules (with interreinforcer intervals of 20, 30, or 40 s) in which the reinforcers were either 20-s or 40-s presentations of a cartoon. In another procedure, they received training on a self-control paradigm in which both reinforcer delay (0.5 s or 40 s) and reinforcer duration (20 s or 40 s of cartoons) varied, and subjects were offered a choice between various combinations of delay and duration. Individual differences in behavior under the self-control procedure were precisely mirrored by individual differences under the fixed-interval schedule. Children who chose the smaller immediate reinforcer on the self-control procedure (impulsive) produced short postreinforcement pauses and high response rates in the fixed-interval conditions, and both measures changed little with changes in fixed-interval value. Conversely, children who chose the larger delayed reinforcer in the self-control condition (the self-controlled subjects) exhibited lower response rates and long postreinforcement pauses, which changed systematically with changes in the interval, in their fixed-interval performances.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Reinforcement Schedules
Once a behavior is learned,...
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...
Information Processing Approach
Self-Regulation
Socialization and Self-Regulation During Toddlerhood

