Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Soft forceps.

D F Roshan1, B Petrikovsky, L Sichinava

  • 1NYU School of Medicine, Tisch Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, NYU Program for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA. roshad01@med.nyu.edu

International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics: the Official Organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics
|March 1, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Key points for good clinical practice in the field of temporomandibular disorders].

Nederlands tijdschrift voor tandheelkunde·2025
Same author

TMD management standards updated.

British dental journal·2025
Same author

Transatlantic Air Travel in the Third Trimester of Pregnancy: Does It Affect the Fetus?

AJP reports·2018
Same author

Limb arteriovenous malformation identified after radiofrequency ablation for selective termination in twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome.

Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology·2013
Same author

An ex utero intrapartum treatment procedure in a patient with a family history of malignant hyperthermia.

International journal of obstetric anesthesia·2013
Same author

Rescue corticosteroids in twin pregnancies and short-term neonatal outcomes.

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2012
Same journal

Response: A comparison in maternal and neonatal outcomes between mild fundal pressure and vacuum extraction for shortening the second stage of labor-Fundal pressure maneuvers are not created equal.

International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics·2026
Same journal

Comparison of outpatient versus inpatient management after early stabilization in preterm prelabor rupture of membranes <34 weeks: Maternal safety, latency, and neonatal outcomes.

International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics·2026
Same journal

Flat glucose response curve during pregnancy and perinatal outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics·2026
Same journal

Preserved large elastic arterial stiffness and impaired conduit artery endothelial function in patients with endometriosis receiving progestin therapy: A cross-sectional observational study.

International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics·2026
Same journal

Development and validation of machine learning-based model for macrosomia and spontaneous preterm birth: A retrospective cohort study.

International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics·2026
Same journal

Letter to the editor: Anovulatory bleeding and the spectrum of bleeding disorders: Understanding heavy menstrual bleeding in adolescents.

International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics·2026
See all related articles

Soft forceps may reduce neonatal facial injuries during delivery. This study compared soft forceps to regular forceps, finding lower rates of abrasion and bruising with the modified instrument.

Area of Science:

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Neonatal Care
  • Surgical Instrumentation

Background:

  • Rising rates of cesarean sections and declining forceps-assisted deliveries due to concerns over maternal and fetal trauma.
  • Fear of litigation influencing obstetric practice, particularly in the United States.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the safety and efficacy of "soft" forceps, featuring gas-sterilized blades with a soft rubber coating.
  • To compare the incidence of fetal injury between soft forceps and regular forceps during low forceps delivery.

Main Methods:

  • A randomized controlled trial involving 96 women requiring forceps-assisted delivery.
  • Participants were allocated to either the regular forceps group (51 women) or the soft forceps group (45 women).
  • All deliveries utilized a Simpson instrument for low forceps application, with fetal injury as the primary outcome measure.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The soft forceps group exhibited significantly lower rates of severe facial abrasion (1.9% vs. 4.1%) compared to the regular forceps group.
  • Minimal skin marking rates were also reduced in the soft forceps group (34% vs. 61%).

Conclusions:

  • Soft forceps demonstrate potential in reducing neonatal facial abrasions and skin bruises during delivery.
  • Further refinement of soft forceps and vacuum extractors is recommended to maintain their role in obstetric practice.