Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluation of an artificial intelligence program for estimating occupational exposures.

Karen L Johnston1, Margaret L Phillips, Nurtan A Esmen

  • 1Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, College of Public Health, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 801 N.E. 13th Street, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA.

The Annals of Occupational Hygiene
|March 1, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Long-Term Symptomatic and Functional Remission with Paliperidone Palmitate 6-Monthly Treatment in Schizophrenia: A 3-Year Post-Hoc Analysis.

Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment·2025
Same author

Comparing two transitioning strategies to paliperidone palmitate once-every-6-months - ERRATUM.

CNS spectrums·2024
Same author

Comparing two transitioning strategies to paliperidone palmitate once-every-6-months.

CNS spectrums·2024
Same author

Relapse Rates With Paliperidone Palmitate in Adult Patients With Schizophrenia: Results for the 6-Month Formulation From an Open-label Extension Study Compared to Real-World Data for the 1-Month and 3-Month Formulations.

The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology·2024
Same author

Earlier Use of Long-Acting Injectable Paliperidone Palmitate Versus Oral Antipsychotics in Patients With Schizophrenia: An Integrated Patient-Level Post Hoc Analysis.

The Journal of clinical psychiatry·2023
Same author

Mortality Among Hardmetal Production Workers: German Historical Cohort Study.

Journal of occupational and environmental medicine·2017

The Estimation and Assessment of Substance Exposure (EASE) program shows moderate accuracy in predicting airborne concentrations for occupational hygiene assessments. It is a useful tool for preliminary assessments but not a replacement for direct exposure monitoring.

Area of Science:

  • Occupational Health and Safety
  • Industrial Hygiene
  • Environmental Science

Background:

  • The Estimation and Assessment of Substance Exposure (EASE) is an AI tool developed by the UK's Health and Safety Executive for estimating airborne concentrations.
  • EASE uses substance vapor pressure and workplace controls for broad exposure predictions.
  • Occupational hygienists may consider using EASE for individual exposure characterizations, necessitating validation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the accuracy of EASE in predicting actual personal exposure monitoring results.
  • To compare EASE-generated time-weighted average (TWA) estimates with measured TWA data for specific chemicals in a manufacturing setting.

Main Methods:

  • Collected 206 full-shift personal breathing zone TWA samples for chloroprene and toluene.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Compared measured TWA data with EASE-estimated TWA concentrations, weighted by task durations.
  • Analyzed Spearman correlation and interquartile range overlap between EASE estimates and measured data.

    • Main Results:

    • Spearman correlations indicated moderate predictive values: 0.55 for chloroprene and 0.44 for toluene.
    • Toluene EASE estimates showed partial overlap with measured data across all areas.
    • Chloroprene EASE estimates varied, with some ranges falling above or overlapping measured data.

    Conclusions:

    • EASE provides moderate predictive value but is not a substitute for actual exposure monitoring.
    • EASE can be utilized for preliminary assessments or in situations where sampling is not feasible.
    • Users must acknowledge potential wide variations and offsets in EASE predictions compared to actual exposures.