Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Written language and intellectual disability].

M T Ferrando-Lucas1, P Banús-Gómez, A G Hoz-Rosales

  • 1Centro de Rehabilitacion del Lenguaje, 28001 Madrid, Espana. mtfer1@terra.es

Revista De Neurologia
|March 1, 2005
PubMed
Summary

A comprehensive neuropsychological approach is crucial for predicting written language skills in children with intellectual disability. Current methods overemphasize IQ, neglecting cognitive and environmental factors vital for accurate prognosis.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Girls with fragile X syndrome: a model for specific developmental disorders].

Revista de neurologia·2008
Same author

[Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: its aetiological factors and endophenotypes].

Revista de neurologia·2006
Same author

[Aspects of cognition and language in children with fragile X syndrome].

Revista de neurologia·2003
Same author

[The autistic spectrum. An epidemiological study and analysis of possible subgroups].

Revista de neurologia·2002

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Developmental Psychology
  • Special Education

Background:

  • Prognosis for autonomy in intellectual disability is challenging, especially regarding written language acquisition.
  • Current approaches often rely heavily on IQ, overlooking other critical factors.
  • Children with intellectual disability require a more nuanced assessment than typically developing peers.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze how learning dysfunctions are addressed in children with intellectual disability.
  • To advocate for an experience-based prognosis for written language capacity.
  • To highlight the limitations of psychometric assessments in predicting reading function.

Main Methods:

  • Reviewing current practices in assessing learning difficulties in intellectual disability.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparing assessment approaches for children with and without intellectual disability.
  • Emphasizing the need for a comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation.

    • Main Results:

    • Intellectual disability assessment often prioritizes IQ over neuropsychological factors.
    • Environmental, social, and comorbid aspects are frequently underestimated.
    • Existing methods fail to explain the variability in reading skills.

    Conclusions:

    • The definition of intellectual disability has evolved beyond IQ scores.
    • A thorough neuropsychological evaluation is essential for understanding reading acquisition.
    • This approach can identify cognitive, pedagogical, social, and pathological barriers.