Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 9, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
The effects of joint misclassification of exposure and disease on the attributable risk
C Vogel1, H Brenner, A Pfahlberg
1Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany.
Abstract:
While there is extensive methodological literature analysing the effects of misclassification on the relative risk under various misclassification scenarios, for the attributable risk only the effects of non-differential misclassification either of exposure or disease, and the effects of non-differential independent misclassification of exposure and disease have been discussed for the 2 x 2-situation. The paper investigates the effects of non-differential correlated misclassification of exposure and disease on the attributable risk taking possible correlations of both types of misclassification into account. Furthermore, a comparison with the corresponding effects on the relative risk is drawn. We propose a matrix-based approach to describe the underlying structure of non-differential misclassification. The bias arising from non-differential misclassification in the attributable risk and relative risk is evaluated in four examples assuming under- or overreporting of exposure and disease. In each of the four examples we found scenarios where pronounced differences in degree and, more importantly, in direction of bias occurred. Our results clearly demonstrate the danger lying in the stereotype transfer of findings regarding misclassification effects on the relative risk to other epidemiologic risk measures and underline the necessity of specific analyses of the effects of misclassification on the attributable risk.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Relative Risk
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial evaluating a...