Related Experiment Videos
Cardiac events in patients with silent myocardial ischemia
Insights
Silent myocardial ischemia (SMI) in coronary artery disease patients indicates a poor prognosis, especially for those with prior infarction. Detecting SMI via Holter monitoring is crucial for risk stratification and improved patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Internal Medicine
- Clinical Research
Background:
- Silent myocardial ischemia (SMI) is a critical concern in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).
- Assessing SMI's impact is vital, particularly after angina symptom resolution with antianginal drugs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the clinical implications of silent myocardial ischemia (SMI) episodes in patients with coronary artery disease.
- To determine the prognostic significance of SMI in patients with and without a history of myocardial infarction.
Main Methods:
- 253 patients with resolved angina symptoms were studied.
- Patients were categorized into 'angina' (no prior MI) and 'infarction' (prior MI) groups.
- Holter monitoring was used to detect SMI before discharge.
Main Results:
- Cardiac event rates were similar between groups (19% angina, 18% infarction).
- Patients with SMI showed significantly higher cumulative cardiac event rates (p < 0.01).
- Multivessel disease and SMI were significant predictors of cardiac events in both groups.
Conclusions:
- SMI is associated with an elevated cardiac event rate in CAD patients, irrespective of prior myocardial infarction.
- Patients with SMI have a poor prognosis, particularly those with a history of myocardial infarction.
- Holter monitoring for SMI detection aids in risk stratification for CAD patients.
Abstract:
The clinical implications of silent myocardial ischemic (SMI) episodes in patients with coronary artery disease were assessed in 253 patients whose angina symptoms were resolved by antianginal drugs. This population included 93 patients without a history of myocardial infarction (angina group) and 160 patients with myocardial infarction (infarction group). These patients were further divided into 2 subgroups according to whether or not SMI was detected by Holter monitoring immediately before discharge. The incidence of cardiac events was 19% for the angina group and 18% for the infarction group. The incidence of cardiac events did not differ between the 2 groups, but the cardiac event profile did. Briefly, 14 angina patients experiencing cardiac events needed coronary revascularization for worsening symptoms, while 18 myocardial infarction patients experiencing cardiac events had another infarction. In both angina and myocardial infarction patients, the cumulative rates of cardiac events were significantly higher in the subgroups with SMI (p less than 0.01 in either group). The significant prognostic factors as determined in the Cox regression model were multivessel disease, asynergy score, and SMI on Holter monitoring for angina patients, and SMI on Holter monitoring and multivessel disease for myocardial infarction patients. In conclusion, the cardiac event rate is significantly elevated in the subgroups with SMI, regardless of whether the patient had previous myocardial infarction; patients with SMI carry a poor prognosis, especially when they have a history of myocardial infarction.