Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Methodological bias in cluster randomised trials.

Seokyung Hahn1, Suezann Puffer, David J Torgerson

  • 1Medical Research Collaborating Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 2nd Floor Cancer Research Institute Building, 28 Yongon Dong, Chongno Gu, Seoul 110-744, Korea. hahns@snu.ac.kr <hahns@snu.ac.kr>

BMC Medical Research Methodology
|March 4, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

SPIRIT 2025 statement: updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials.

Lancet (London, England)·2026
Same author

Reducing the impact of diabetic foot ulcers (REDUCE): study protocol for an effectiveness and cost-effectiveness randomised controlled trial with embedded process evaluation.

BMJ open·2026
Same author

Methodological changes made to NIHR-funded randomised controlled trials: review of 100 trials.

Trials·2026
Same author

Correction: Predictive value of BMD for hip and other fractures: a meta-analysis to update FRAX.

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA·2026
Same author

Challenges and solutions to the implementation of studies within a trial: The experiences of the PROMETHEUS programme.

Research methods in medicine & health sciences·2026
Same author

Correction: A meta-analysis of previous falls and subsequent fracture risk in cohort studies.

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA·2026
Same journal

Integrating health economics and implementation science: a call to action.

BMC medical research methodology·2026
Same journal

Methods for incorporating test result information within the high-dimensional propensity score framework: application in UK electronic health record data.

BMC medical research methodology·2026
Same journal

Sparse multi-way DMDC for longitudinal classification in high dimension low sample size data.

BMC medical research methodology·2026
Same journal

Tree-based exploratory identification of predictive biomarkers in non-randomized data.

BMC medical research methodology·2026
Same journal

Comparative evaluation of interrupted time series analytical methods for healthcare quality improvement research: a Monte Carlo simulation study.

BMC medical research methodology·2026
Same journal

Methodological advances in claims-based dementia algorithms: integrating medication and clinical data for medicare populations.

BMC medical research methodology·2026
See all related articles

Methodological biases are common in cluster randomized trials, potentially leading to inaccurate results. Researchers should prioritize individual randomization or implement specific strategies to mitigate bias in cluster designs.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trials Methodology
  • Biostatistics
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Cluster randomized trials (CRTs) are prone to methodological issues often overlooked by researchers.
  • These issues can introduce significant bias into study findings.
  • Understanding these problems is crucial for improving the reliability of CRTs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and discuss common methodological problems in cluster randomized trials.
  • To investigate potential sources of bias in CRTs.
  • To compare the characteristics of potentially biased CRTs with well-designed ones.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of cluster randomized trials from recent reviews and systematic reviews.
  • Comparison of participant age between intervention groups in 'good' versus potentially biased trials.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Use of funnel plots to compare effect sizes between individually randomized and cluster randomized trials.

    • Main Results:

    • Cluster randomized trials with methodological biases tend to exhibit age imbalances between treatment groups.
    • Funnel plot analysis indicated that cluster randomized trials may overestimate treatment effects (e.g., hip protectors) compared to individually randomized trials.
    • Evidence suggests CRTs can produce biased estimates of treatment effect.

    Conclusions:

    • Methodological biases are frequent in the design and execution of cluster randomized trials.
    • Strategies to mitigate bias include prioritizing individual randomization where feasible.
    • When cluster randomization is necessary, identifying participants before cluster allocation or using an independent recruiter can reduce bias.