Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Spatial interference among moving targets.

Peter J Bex1, Steven C Dakin

  • 1Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, 11-43 Bath Street, London EC1V 9EL, UK. p.bex@ucl.ac.uk

Vision Research
|March 4, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Dissociable effects of element-lifetime and stimulus-duration on local and global motion processing: An equivalent noise study.

Journal of vision·2026
Same author

Empathy and the Structural Representation of Facial Affect: Evidence from a Genetic-Algorithm Face Synthesis Task.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Novel color vision assessment tool: AIM color detection and discrimination.

Journal of translational medicine·2025
Same author

Correction to: 'Perceiving object size in pictures involves high-level processing' (2025), by Altan <i>et al.</i>

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2025
Same author

Correction: Spatial frequency adaptation modulates population receptive field sizes.

eLife·2025
Same author

Intact Perceptual Interactions of Interocular Temporal Phase and Contrast Disparities in Amblyopia.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2025
Same journal

Computational and mathematical models in vision: Quantitative approaches to understanding visual perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Complex interactions between lightness, chroma, and hue in color ensemble perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Driving with autism spectrum disorder: Exploring the impact of tactile hazard warnings on gaze behavior and hazard responses.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Early visual processing in adults with ADHD: evidence from contrast sensitivity, spatial integration, and external noise.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Pupil reflexes generate the peripheral drift illusion due to ON/OFF motion responses.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Perceived direction of glass patterns can flip by 90°: A neural model.

Vision research·2026
See all related articles

Spatial interference in peripheral vision increases with eccentricity. This visual crowding effect, impacting motion perception, suggests large receptive fields integrate complex image structures, challenging simpler models.

Area of Science:

  • Visual neuroscience
  • Perception psychology
  • Computational vision

Background:

  • Peripheral vision is limited by reduced spatial acuity and crowding.
  • Motion perception, unlike static form, is relatively stable across the visual field.
  • Investigating spatial interference in motion perception across retinal eccentricities is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To measure spatial interference among moving elements in peripheral vision.
  • To assess if motion integration explains sensitivity loss.
  • To determine the impact of flanker configuration on motion perception.

Main Methods:

  • Participants identified the motion direction of a central target element.
  • Four drifting flanking elements were presented at varying retinal eccentricities.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Flanker configurations included random, translational, rotational, and expansion patterns.

    • Main Results:

    • Sensitivity to target motion direction was significantly impaired by flanking elements.
    • Spatial interference increased with retinal eccentricity.
    • Disruption varied with flanker configuration, favoring translation over rotation/expansion patterns.
    • Interference showed low-pass tuning for spatial frequency and broad tuning for temporal frequency.

    Conclusions:

    • Spatial interference in motion perception is not constant across the visual field and increases with eccentricity.
    • Results challenge models based on image quality, masking, or simple averaging.
    • Findings support a model where spatial interference arises from integrating meaningful image structure within large receptive fields.