Chloroplast DNA base substitutions: an experimental assessment

Monica Guhamajumdar1, Barbara B Sears

  • 1Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824-1312, USA.

Insights

Spontaneous base substitutions in chloroplast DNA were quantified in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Oxidative damage may drive the observed bias toward transversion mutations in chloroplast 16S rRNA genes.

Area of Science:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Genetics
  • Plant Science

Background:

  • Chloroplast DNA is susceptible to mutations.
  • Understanding spontaneous mutations is crucial for evolutionary and genetic studies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To directly measure the frequency and types of spontaneous base substitutions in chloroplast DNA.
  • To investigate the mutation spectrum in the Chlamydomonas reinhardtii 16S rRNA gene.

Main Methods:

  • Experimental assessment of base substitutions at a specific target site in the chloroplast 16S rRNA gene.
  • Quantification of mutation frequencies and types (transitions vs. transversions).
  • Identification of new mutations conferring spectinomycin resistance.

Main Results:

  • Base substitutions occurred at a frequency of 0.9-11 per 10^9 viable cells.
  • Four new spectinomycin-resistance mutations were identified.
  • A bias toward transversion mutations was observed, particularly A/T --> C/G transversions.

Conclusions:

  • Spontaneous base substitutions in chloroplast DNA occur at a measurable frequency.
  • Oxidative damage is suggested as a primary driver of base substitution mutations in chloroplasts.
  • The findings provide insights into chloroplast genome stability and evolution.

Related Concept Videos

Spontaneous and Induced Mutations01:30

Spontaneous and Induced Mutations

Spontaneous mutations arise infrequently during DNA replication due to errors in the process. A key factor behind these errors is tautomeric shifts in nitrogenous bases, where bases transition from keto to enol forms or amino to imino forms. This shift can alter base-pairing rules, leading to mutations. Additionally, reactive oxygen species (ROS) arising from aerobic metabolism can damage DNA, resulting in depurination (loss of a purine base) or depyrimidination (loss of a pyrimidine base).
Genome Copying Errors02:46

Genome Copying Errors

DNA replication is a well-evolved process that copies millions of base pairs with high fidelity during each cell division. Occasionally a wrong base or a long stretch of wrong bases may get added to the daughter strands. If the errors are left unchecked, cells might accumulate several mutations that might endanger their  survival. Therefore, the copying errors are checked and repaired at three levels.
Overview of DNA Repair02:25

Overview of DNA Repair

In order to be passed through generations, genomic DNA must be undamaged and error-free. However, every day, DNA in a cell undergoes several thousand to a million damaging events by natural causes and external factors. Ionizing radiation such as UV rays, free radicals produced during cellular respiration, and hydrolytic damage from metabolic reactions can alter the structure of DNA. Damages caused include single-base alteration, base dimerization, chain breaks, and cross-linkage.
Chemically...
Base-pairing and DNA Repair02:27

Base-pairing and DNA Repair

Erwin Chargaff’s rules on DNA equivalence paved the way for the discovery of base pairing in DNA. Chargaff’s rules state that in a double-stranded DNA molecule,
Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs02:26

Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs

Sequencing of the human genome has opened up several best-kept secrets of the genome. Scientists have identified thousands of genome variations that exist within a population. These variations can be a single nucleotide or a larger chromosomal variation.
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
Comparing Mitochondrial, Chloroplast, and Prokaryotic Genomes02:16

Comparing Mitochondrial, Chloroplast, and Prokaryotic Genomes

The present-day mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes have retained some of the characteristics of their ancestral prokaryotes and also have acquired new attributes during their evolution within eukaryotic cells. Like prokaryotic genomes, mitochondrial and chloroplast genomes neither bind with histone-like proteins nor show complex packaging into chromosome-like structures, as observed in eukaryotes. Unlike mitotic cell divisions observed in eukaryotic cells, mitochondria and chloroplasts...