Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Post-choice information processing by pigeons.

Tracy I Martin1, Thomas R Zentall

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506, USA.

Animal Cognition
|March 4, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The freedom to choose may be an artifact of a preference for spatial location.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2026
Same author

Episodic memory: Rats can remember the context.

Current biology : CB·2026
Same author

Episodic memory in animals?

Translational neuroscience·2025
Same author

Ephemeral reward task: Why is it so difficult for pigeons to learn it?

Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition·2025
Same author

Peter Urcuioli's lasting contribution: Animal memory research and an important model of stimulus class formation.

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior·2025
Same author

Complex relationship between response rate and preference in pigeons: Williams (1992) revisited.

Learning & behavior·2024
Same journal

Rank and payoff biases influence subject choices in a foraging task among sanctuary chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).

Animal cognition·2026
Same journal

Buzzed but not elated? Effect of ethanol on cognitive judgement bias in honeybees.

Animal cognition·2026
Same journal

Dogs tuned to conspecific vocalizations: behavioral evidence for a voice processing preference.

Animal cognition·2026
Same journal

Variation in song structure does not predict associative learning performance in zebra finches (Taeniopygia castanotis) raised under controlled cultural conditions.

Animal cognition·2026
Same journal

Executive functioning in wild guppies: investigating the impact of a pharmaceutical pollutant.

Animal cognition·2026
Same journal

Performance of sheep and goats in a delay of gratification task.

Animal cognition·2026
See all related articles

Pigeons learn matching-to-sample tasks faster when the stimulus display remains after an incorrect choice. This penalty-time procedure allows pigeons to review stimuli, aiding their learning process.

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral psychology
  • Animal cognition
  • Learning theory

Background:

  • Conditional discrimination, or matching-to-sample, involves selecting a comparison stimulus that matches a sample stimulus.
  • Previous research indicates that maintaining the stimulus display after an incorrect response (penalty-time procedure) facilitates learning in pigeons.
  • The exact mechanism by which penalty-time aids acquisition remains under investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To test the hypothesis that the penalty-time procedure facilitates learning by allowing pigeons to review and learn from the maintained stimulus display after an incorrect choice.
  • To investigate whether the maintenance of the stimulus display, rather than the aversiveness of the penalty, is responsible for enhanced acquisition.

Main Methods:

  • Three groups of pigeons were used: a standard penalty-time group, a misinformation group, and a control group with no penalty time.

Related Experiment Videos

  • In the misinformation group, the sample stimulus changed to match the incorrect comparison after an error, providing post-choice misinformation.
  • Performance was measured by the rate of acquisition of the matching-to-sample task.

    • Main Results:

    • The misinformation group acquired the matching task significantly slower than the standard penalty-time group.
    • The control group's acquisition rate fell between the standard penalty-time and misinformation groups.
    • These findings suggest that the maintained stimulus display, not just the penalty, aids learning.

    Conclusions:

    • The penalty-time procedure facilitates matching-to-sample acquisition in pigeons by allowing them to review or gain information from the stimulus display after an incorrect choice.
    • This study provides the first evidence of such an effect in a nonhuman species.
    • The results highlight the importance of stimulus review in learning and decision-making processes.