Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 10, 2026

A Coupled Experiment-finite Element Modeling Methodology for Assessing High Strain Rate Mechanical Response of Soft Biomaterials
Published on: May 18, 2015
Penetrating missile injuries during asymmetric warfare in the 2003 Gulf conflict
D E Hinsley1, P A E Rosell, T K Rowlands
1Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Headington, Oxford, UK. DEHinsley@aol.com <DEHinsley@aol.com>
Background:
War wounds produce a significant burden on medical facilities in wartime. Workload from the recent conflict was documented in order to guide future medical needs.
Methods:
All data on war injuries were collected prospectively. This information was supplemented with a review of all patients admitted during the study period.
Results:
During the first 2 weeks of the conflict, the sole British field hospital in the region received 482 casualties. One hundred and four were battle injuries of which nine were burns. Seventy-nine casualties had their initial surgery performed by British military surgeons and form the study group. Twenty-nine casualties (37 per cent) sustained gunshot wounds, 49 (62 per cent) suffered wounds from fragmentation weapons and one casualty detonated an antipersonnel mine. These 79 patients had a total of 123 wounds that were scored prospectively using the Red Cross Wound Classification. Twenty-seven (34 per cent) of the wounded were non-combatants; eight of these were children. Four patients (5 per cent) died.
Conclusion:
War is changing; modern conflicts appear likely to be fought in urban or remote environments, producing different wounding patterns and placing non-combatants in the line of fire. Military medical skills training and available resources must reflect these fundamental changes in preparation for future conflicts.
Related Concept Videos
Esophageal Perforation-I: Introduction
The location of esophageal perforation can vary, occurring anywhere along the esophagus.
Traumatic Brain Injury l: Introduction

