Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Age-related differences in multiple-object tracking.

Lana M Trick1, Tahlia Perl, Naina Sethi

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada.

The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
|March 5, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Multiple-object tracking in displays where each item is unique: Do competing organizations impair the ability to track targets that share a common colour or shape?

Vision research·2026
Same author

Multiple-Object Tracking and Visually Guided Touch: Dual-Task Interference Reveals Distinct Effects of Target Indexing and Target Report Method.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same author

Multiple-object tracking and visually guided touch.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2021
Same author

Does the standard search task predict performance in related tasks for Kanizsa-style illusory contours?

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2019
Same author

Why doesn't emotional valence affect subitising and counting in simple enumeration?

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2019
Same author

Visual search does not always predict performance in tasks that require finding targets among distractors: The case of line-ending illusory contours.

Acta psychologica·2019

Older adults show a reduced ability in multiple-object tracking compared to younger adults, impacting their capacity to follow moving items. This age-related decline affects tracking performance even when items are static.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human factors

Background:

  • Multiple-object tracking (MOT) is a key cognitive function for real-world navigation and attention.
  • Understanding age-related changes in MOT is crucial for assessing functional independence and designing assistive technologies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate age-related differences in multiple-object tracking (MOT) performance.
  • To compare the tracking capabilities of young and older adults in dynamic and static visual environments.

Main Methods:

  • Participants (young adults, M=19; older adults, M=73) performed two MOT tasks involving 1-4 targets among 10 items.
  • Tasks included monitoring moving targets and reporting target positions in both dynamic and static conditions.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • All participants could track multiple items, but young adults tracked an average of 4 items, while older adults tracked an average of 3.
  • Accuracy for reporting static target positions was 100% across all participants, regardless of the number of targets.

Conclusions:

  • Significant age differences exist in the ability to track moving objects.
  • While static accuracy is preserved, dynamic tracking deficits in older adults suggest age-related declines in attentional or processing capacities for MOT.