Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The contribution of elaborative processing to the contextual interference effect.

D L Wright1, Y Li, C Whitacre

  • 1Department of Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station.

Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport
|March 1, 1992
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Off-line learning in a rhythmic bimanual task: early feedback dependency is reduced over wakefulness.

Psychological research·2020
Same author

Structure-Guided In Vitro to In Vivo Pharmacokinetic Optimization of Propargyl-Linked Antifolates.

Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals·2019
Same author

Influence of Flower Thrips on Fusarium Hardlock Severity.

Plant disease·2019
Same author

First Report of Soybean Rust Caused by Phakopsora pachyrhizi on Phaseolus spp. in the United States.

Plant disease·2019
Same author

First Report of Soybean Rust Caused by Phakopsora pachyrhizi on Erythrina herbacea (Coral Bean).

Plant disease·2019
Same author

Effect of Fungicide and Timing of Application on Soybean Rust Severity and Yield.

Plant disease·2019
Same journal

A One-Year Longitudinal Impact Tracking Study of Participation in Physical Education on Academic Achievements of Chinese High School Students From the Perspective of Development Trajectory Visualization.

Research quarterly for exercise and sport·2026
Same journal

Perceived, but Not Neuromuscular, Fatigue Demonstrated After Doubles Pickleball Competitions.

Research quarterly for exercise and sport·2026
Same journal

In- and Out-of-Possession Running and Technical-Tactical Performance in Soccer.

Research quarterly for exercise and sport·2026
Same journal

Effect of Visual Illusion on Motor Skills Learning in Boys With Developmental Coordination Disorder: A School-Based Randomized Controlled Trial.

Research quarterly for exercise and sport·2026
Same journal

Challenge Under Pressure Contextual Interference or Differential Learning.

Research quarterly for exercise and sport·2026
Same journal

Examining Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander Youth Attitudes Toward Physical Activity and Physical Education.

Research quarterly for exercise and sport·2026
See all related articles

Adding extra processing during motor skill learning can hinder performance. Specifically, enhancing random practice with intertask processing negatively impacted motor sequence retention, suggesting limits to beneficial practice interference.

Area of Science:

  • Motor Learning and Control
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Sports Science

Background:

  • Contextual interference (CI) theory suggests random practice enhances motor skill retention compared to blocked practice.
  • The role of additional processing (intratask and intertask) during practice, particularly under varying CI levels, requires further investigation.
  • Understanding how to optimize practice conditions for long-term motor memory is crucial for skill acquisition.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effects of supplemental intertask and intratask processing on motor sequence retention.
  • To examine how these processing additions interact with high and low contextual interference practice conditions.
  • To determine the optimal level of practice interference for facilitating long-term motor memory.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Participants practiced three motor sequences under blocked or random practice formats.
  • Additional intratask processing, intertask processing, or no additional processing was administered.
  • Retention and recall of motor sequences were assessed after a 21-day interval.

Main Results:

  • Intertask processing benefited retention in low contextual interference (random practice) conditions.
  • Supplementing random practice with intertask processing impaired task acquisition and significantly reduced retention performance.
  • Excessive interference during practice may not always lead to improved long-term retention.

Conclusions:

  • While intertask processing can enhance motor skill retention under specific low interference conditions, excessive processing can be detrimental.
  • There appears to be an optimal limit to the amount of interference that facilitates motor learning and retention.
  • Findings suggest a nuanced approach to designing practice protocols, considering both interference levels and supplemental processing strategies.