Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Disasters and development: Part 3: Assessing trade-offs in investing in vulnerability reduction.

Rob S Stephenson1, Charles DuFrane

  • 1Disaster Management Center, Department of Engineering Professional Development, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 432 North Lake Street, Madison, WI 53706-1498, USA.

Prehospital and Disaster Medicine
|March 8, 2005
PubMed
Summary

Governments can make informed decisions on disaster mitigation investments by comparing development alternatives. Analyzing costs, benefits, and potential losses, including non-monetary impacts, aids in cost-effective vulnerability reduction strategies.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Microscopic changes in the spinal extensor musculature in people with chronic spinal pain: a systematic review.

The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society·2022
Same author

Disasters and development: Part 2: Understanding and exploiting disaster-development linkages.

Prehospital and disaster medicine·2005
Same author

Disasters and development: Part 2: understanding and exploiting disaster-development linkages.

Prehospital and disaster medicine·2003
Same author

Disasters and development: Part I. Relationships between disasters and development.

Prehospital and disaster medicine·2002

Area of Science:

  • Economics
  • Public Policy
  • Disaster Management

Background:

  • Governments face complex decisions regarding investments in vulnerability reduction.
  • Comparing development alternatives requires understanding risk and uncertainty.
  • Economic analyses are challenged by uncertainty in catastrophic event prediction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline methods for government decision-making on vulnerability reduction investments.
  • To explain techniques for comparing development alternatives and investment priorities.
  • To detail the types of impacts and losses associated with disaster mitigation.

Main Methods:

  • Comparing development alternatives using cost-benefit analyses.
  • Identifying competing costs and benefits for disaster mitigation investments.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluating impacts including direct/indirect monetary and non-monetary effects, and natural resource loss.

    • Main Results:

    • Uncertainty presents significant challenges in economic analyses for disaster mitigation.
    • Methods exist to identify complex trade-offs in restructuring investment priorities.
    • Cost-effectiveness of interventions can be judged by evaluating various impacts.

    Conclusions:

    • Analytical frameworks help screen projects by clarifying outcomes and influencing factors.
    • Understanding opportunity costs and present value is crucial for investment decisions.
    • A systematic approach to evaluating diverse impacts enhances disaster mitigation planning.