Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Module five: implementation of ethics review.

Ames Dhai1

  • 1Nelson R. Mandela School of Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Private Bag 7, Congella 4013, South Africa. dhaia1@ukzn.ac.za.

Developing World Bioethics
|March 8, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reminding ourselves of the ethico-regulatory framework for health research.

South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde·2026
Same author

Analytical treatment interruption among women with HIV in southern Africa who received VRC01 or placebo in the Antibody Mediated Prevention Study: ATI stakeholder engagement, implementation and early clinical data.

Journal of the International AIDS Society·2025
Same author

COVID-19: border closures violate human rights - Authors' reply.

Lancet (London, England)·2025
Same author

Vulnerability, social value and the equitable sharing of benefits from research: beyond the placebo and access debates.

Frontiers in medicine·2024
Same author

Human rights and the COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective and prospective analysis.

Lancet (London, England)·2022
Same author

Evolving capacity of children and their best interests in the context of health research in South Africa: An ethico-legal position.

Developing world bioethics·2022

This module guides Research Ethics Committee members and investigators on ethical review processes. It covers South African and World Health Organisation guidelines and the history of ethical review in South Africa.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Research Ethics
  • Clinical Trial Oversight
  • Regulatory Compliance in Health Research

Background:

  • Research ethics committees (RECs) play a crucial role in safeguarding participants.
  • Navigating the complexities of ethical review requires clear understanding of guidelines and processes.
  • The South African context for research ethics has a specific historical development.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To educate REC members and investigators on critical issues in the research review process.
  • To provide comprehensive information on South African Department of Health and World Health Organisation research ethics guidelines.
  • To detail the historical evolution of the research ethics review process in South Africa.

Main Methods:

  • Extensive reference to established research ethics guidelines.
Keywords:
Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Related Experiment Videos

  • Educational module format for clarity and accessibility.
  • Historical analysis of the research review process.

    • Main Results:

    • Enhanced understanding of REC requirements for investigators.
    • Informed awareness of ethical considerations during research review.
    • Knowledge of the South African research ethics review landscape.

    Conclusions:

    • Adherence to guidelines ensures ethical research conduct.
    • Understanding the review process facilitates smoother research implementation.
    • The module serves as a vital resource for ethical research oversight in South Africa.