Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Module six: special issues.

Benjamin Schneider1, Udo Schüklenk

  • 1University of the Witwatersrand, Division of Bioethics, WITS 2050, South Africa.

Developing World Bioethics
|March 8, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Phage-Functionalized Magnetic Separation for Rapid and Selective Detection of <i>Escherichia coli</i>.

ACS omega·2026
Same author

Capable, Unbearably Suffering, and Excluded: People With Mental Illness and the Ethics of Canada's Assisted-Dying Regime.

Bioethics·2026
Same author

Why a Military Global Health Ethics Special Issue of the Journal?

Developing world bioethics·2026
Same author

Academic Integrity Is Coming Increasingly Under Attack From Academics Using AI Tools as a Short-Cut to Publications.

Bioethics·2026
Same author

Comprehensive dataset on macro-porous PVDF flat sheet membranes for membrane distillation: Materials characteristics, morphology and performance data.

Data in brief·2026
Same author

There is no consequentialist ethical justification for registries of conscientious non-objectors.

Journal of medical ethics·2026
Same journal

Exploring the Ethical Concerns of Diagnosis-Related Group System in Healthcare: Lessons and Recommendations for Malaysia.

Developing world bioethics·2026
Same journal

Ethics of Military Global Health Engagements.

Developing world bioethics·2026
Same journal

Frontline Healthcare Professionals' Perceptions of the Duty to Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Multi-Method Study in Mozambique.

Developing world bioethics·2026
Same journal

Exploring the Challenges and Legal Implications of Secondary Use of Health Data in South Africa.

Developing world bioethics·2026
Same journal

When Constraint Becomes Constitutive: Moral Distress and Ethical Coping Among Emergency Healthcare Workers in the West Bank, Palestine.

Developing world bioethics·2026
Same journal

Bodily Reflections on Living Organ Donors Through the Lens of Confucian Body Philosophy.

Developing world bioethics·2026
See all related articles

This module addresses critical research ethics topics, including scientific misconduct, publication ethics, authorship guidelines, and conflicts of interest in biomedical research.

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Research Ethics
  • Publication Ethics
  • Research Integrity

Background:

  • Existing modules provide foundational knowledge in research ethics.
  • Gaps remain in comprehensive coverage of specific ethical challenges.
  • Specialized issues in social science and epidemiology require focused attention.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To elucidate principles of scientific misconduct and its implications.
  • To define clear authorship guidelines and address publication ethics.
  • To explore unique challenges in social science and epidemiological research.
  • To identify and manage conflicts of interest in biomedical research.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature and ethical guidelines.
Keywords:
Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Related Experiment Videos

  • Case study analysis of scientific misconduct scenarios.
  • Discussion of authorship criteria and publication best practices.
  • Examination of ethical considerations specific to social science and epidemiology.
  • Analysis of conflict of interest scenarios and management strategies.

    • Main Results:

    • Scientific misconduct can undermine research integrity and public trust.
    • Clear authorship guidelines are essential for fair attribution and accountability.
    • Social science and epidemiological research present distinct ethical dilemmas.
    • Proactive management of conflicts of interest is crucial for unbiased research.

    Conclusions:

    • Addressing these specialized topics enhances the overall ethical framework of biomedical research.
    • Adherence to ethical guidelines promotes trustworthy and reliable scientific outcomes.
    • Comprehensive training in research ethics is vital for all stakeholders.