Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Large trials or meta-analysis? That is not the question.

José Villar1, Gilda Piaggio

  • 1UNDP/UNFPA/WHO/World Bank, Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. villarj@who.ch

Best Practice & Research. Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology
|March 8, 2005
PubMed
Summary

Identifying effective treatments requires careful evidence selection. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials offers a robust statistical approach, but heterogeneity must be assessed for future trial planning.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

COVID-19 vaccination status during pregnancy and preeclampsia risk: the pandemic-era cohort of the INTERCOVID consortium.

EClinicalMedicine·2026
Same author

Normative growth trajectories of fetal brain regions validated by satisfactory maturation of neurodevelopmental domains at 2 years of age.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

International Normative Charts for Twin Weight, Length, and Head Circumference at Birth, By Gestational Age and Sex: The Twin Neonatal Cross-Sectional Study of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project.

Twin research and human genetics : the official journal of the International Society for Twin Studies·2026
Same author

Early neurophysiological markers of aberrant auditory processing associated with increased risk of autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review.

Pediatric investigation·2025
Same author

Small for gestational age subgroups have differential morbidity, growth, and neurodevelopment at age 2: the INTERBIO-21<sup>st</sup> Newborn Study.

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology·2025
Same author

Association between gestational age-specific weight gain in pregnancy and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes: a secondary analysis of the INTERBIO-21st Fetal Study.

The American journal of clinical nutrition·2025

Area of Science:

  • Evidence-based medicine
  • Clinical trial methodology
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Selecting optimal treatment modalities is challenging.
  • Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for unbiased intervention evaluation.
  • Systematic reviews synthesize evidence from multiple studies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline the process of evidence selection and evaluation for treatment modalities.
  • To highlight the role of meta-analysis in synthesizing RCT results.
  • To emphasize the importance of assessing heterogeneity for future research.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review methodology for evidence identification.
  • Meta-analysis as a statistical technique for pooling trial data.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluation of heterogeneity and subgroup analysis.

    • Main Results:

    • Randomized controlled trials provide the least biased evidence.
    • Meta-analysis is a common statistical strategy for systematic reviews.
    • Heterogeneity assessment is crucial for interpreting pooled results.

    Conclusions:

    • Careful selection and evaluation of evidence are vital for identifying effective treatments.
    • Meta-analysis is a powerful tool, but heterogeneity must be addressed.
    • Understanding trial variations aids in designing future large-scale studies.