Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evidence-based neonatal care.

Henry L Halliday1

  • 1Regional Neonatal Unit, Royal Maternity Hospital, Belfast and Department of Child Health, Queen's University of Belfast, Grosvenor Road, Belfast, Northern Ireland BT12 6BB, UK. h.halliday@qub.ac.uk

Best Practice & Research. Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology
|March 8, 2005
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

European Consensus Guidelines on the Management of Respiratory Distress Syndrome: 2022 Update.

Neonatology·2023
Same author

Late (≥ 7 days) systemic postnatal corticosteroids for prevention of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2021
Same author

Early (< 7 days) systemic postnatal corticosteroids for prevention of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2021
Same author

Global Neonatal Research.

Neonatology·2021
Same author

Sharing Progress in Neonatology (SPIN): Oxygen and Surfactant, Optimal Ventilation, Pulmonary Hypertension, Diagnostic Procedures, and Definition of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia.

Neonatology·2021
Same author

Evaluation of the Quality of Perinatal Trials: Making the GRADE.

Neonatology·2021
Same journal

A risk-based classification of late-onset fetal growth disorders according to intrapartum fetal compromise.

Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology·2026
Same journal

The Cardiac-Fetal-Placental Unit: links between umbilical venous flow and maternal hemodynamics in fetal growth restriction.

Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology·2026
Same journal

Psychosocial interventions for women who are pregnant following a previous reproductive loss: A scoping review.

Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology·2026
Same journal

Controversies in fetal therapy.

Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology·2026
Same journal

Alloimmunisation in pregnancy: current management and future perspectives.

Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology·2026
Same journal

Consensus in prenatal management of Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn.

Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology·2026
See all related articles

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in neonatal care, starting in the 1950s, have led to systematic reviews. The Cochrane Library offers 171 reviews, but evidence varies, with less focus on developing countries.

Area of Science:

  • Neonatal medicine
  • Evidence-based practice
  • Clinical research

Background:

  • The introduction of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in neonatal care emerged from addressing serious infant health issues like retinopathy of prematurity.
  • Systematic reviews, notably from the Cochrane Collaboration's Neonatal Module, synthesize evidence from numerous RCTs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the extent and coverage of evidence-based neonatal care provided by systematic reviews.
  • To identify areas within neonatology that are well-supported by evidence versus those needing further research.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of 171 systematic reviews of interventions in neonatology available in the Cochrane Library.
  • Categorization of reviews based on the specific area of neonatal care covered and geographical focus.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Systematic reviews cover many aspects of neonatal care, with strong evidence for interventions like surfactant therapy and assisted ventilation for respiratory distress.
  • Areas such as neonatal resuscitation and jaundice management have less comprehensive evidence-based reviews.
  • The majority of available reviews focus on neonatal care in developed countries, with limited evidence applicable to developing nations.

Conclusions:

  • While systematic reviews provide a strong foundation for neonatal care in some areas, significant gaps exist, particularly in resuscitation and jaundice management.
  • There is a critical need for more research and systematic reviews focused on the unique challenges of neonatal care in developing countries.