Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 19, 2026

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
Published on: October 11, 2018
AML M3 and AML M3 variant each have a distinct gene expression signature but also share patterns different from other
Torsten Haferlach1, Alexander Kohlmann, Susanne Schnittger
1Laboratory for Leukemia Diagnostics, University Hospital Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany. torsten.haferlach@med.uni-muenchen.de
Abstract:
Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) with t(15;17) appears in two phenotypes: AML M3, with abnormal promyelocytes showing heavy granulation and bundles of Auer rods, and AML M3 variant (M3v), with non- or hypogranular cytoplasm and a bilobed nucleus. We investigated the global gene expression profiles of 35 APL patients (19 AML M3, 16 AML M3v) by using high-density DNA-oligonucleotide microarrays. First, an unsupervised approach clearly separated APL samples from other AMLs characterized genetically as t(8;21) (n = 35), inv(16) (n = 35), or t(11q23)/MLL (n = 35) or as having a normal karyotype (n = 50). Second, we found genes with functional relevance for blood coagulation that were differentially expressed between APL and other AMLs. Furthermore, a supervised pairwise comparison between M3 and M3v revealed differential expression of genes that encode for biological functions and pathways such as granulation and maturation of hematologic cells, explaining morphologic and clinical differences. Discrimination between M3 and M3v based on gene signatures showed a median classification accuracy of 90% by use of 10-fold CV and support vector machines. Additional molecular mutations such as FLT3-LM, which were significantly more frequent in M3v than in M3 (P < 0.0001), may partly contribute to the different phenotypes. However, linear regression analysis demonstrated that genes differentially expressed between M3 and M3v did not correlate with FLT3-LM.
Insights
Gene expression profiling distinguishes acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) subtypes M3 and M3 variant (M3v). This study identified distinct gene signatures linked to hematologic cell maturation, explaining phenotypic differences in APL patients.
Area of Science:
- Hematology
- Molecular Biology
- Genomics
Background:
- Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) with t(15;17) presents as AML M3 (hypergranular) or AML M3 variant (M3v, hypogranular).
- Distinct morphologic and clinical features differentiate these APL subtypes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate global gene expression profiles in APL subtypes M3 and M3v.
- To identify gene signatures that differentiate APL from other acute myeloid leukemias (AMLs).
- To elucidate molecular mechanisms underlying the phenotypic differences between M3 and M3v.
Main Methods:
- High-density DNA-oligonucleotide microarrays were used to analyze gene expression in 35 APL patients (19 M3, 16 M3v).
- Unsupervised and supervised learning approaches, including 10-fold cross-validation and support vector machines, were employed.
- Gene expression data were compared with genetic AML classifications and FLT3-LM mutation status.
Main Results:
- APL samples were clearly separated from other AML subtypes (t(8;21), inv(16), t(11q23)/MLL, normal karyotype).
- Genes involved in blood coagulation were differentially expressed between APL and other AMLs.
- Supervised analysis identified differential gene expression between M3 and M3v related to hematologic cell granulation and maturation, achieving 90% classification accuracy.
- FLT3-LM mutations were more frequent in M3v but did not correlate with the identified M3/M3v gene signatures.
Conclusions:
- Global gene expression analysis effectively distinguishes APL subtypes M3 and M3v.
- Differential gene expression patterns provide insights into the distinct morphologic and clinical characteristics of M3 and M3v.
- While FLT3-LM mutations are associated with M3v, they do not explain the observed gene expression differences between the subtypes.
Related Concept Videos
Multiple Allele Traits
DNA Microarrays
RNA Splicing