Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 4, 2026
Three Different Protocols of Corneal Collagen Crosslinking in Keratoconus: Conventional, Accelerated and Iontophoresis
Published on: November 12, 2015
Comparison of keratometric and topographic cylinder and axis measurements on normal corneas with low astigmatism
C H Karabatsas1, I Papaefthymiou, I M Aslanides
1Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Larissa, Larissa - Greece. kkaramp@med.uth.gr
Purpose:
To evaluate agreement in measurements of astigmatic axis power and location between keratometry and computer assisted videokeratography (corneal topography) on normal corneas with less than 1.50 D of idiopathic astigmatism.
Methods:
Keratometric readings with the 10 SL/O Zeiss ophthalmometer and corneal topographic maps with the TMS-1 were obtained by two independent examiners on 32 normal corneas. Measurement agreement between the two instruments was evaluated in regard to steep and flat meridian power and location, and in astigmatism magnitude (D).
Results:
The limits of agreement (d-2 SD to d+2 SD) between the two instruments were found to be broad for clinical purposes in measuring the steep meridian power (-0.16 to -1.20 D), flat meridian power (0.43 to -1.25 D), and astigmatism (0.60 to -1.12 D). A constant bias of the TMS-1 towards the 10 SL/O Zeiss ophthalmometer was found, in measuring steeper both principal meridians and higher amount of astigmatism. Mean location difference was 19 degrees (+/-190) for the steep meridian and 17 degrees (+/-20 degrees) for the flat meridian.
Conclusions:
Despite the differences seen in measurements between the 10 SL/O ophthalmometer and the TMS-1, these differences may be clinically small enough for the methods to be used interchangeably in measuring only the magnitude of astigmatism on normal corneas. However, the disagreement in astigmatism axes is too great to be ignored.
