Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Quantifying and reducing uncertainty in life cycle assessment using the Bayesian Monte Carlo method.

Shih-Chi Lo1, Hwong-Wen Ma, Shang-Lien Lo

  • 1Graduate Institute of Environmental Engineering, National Taiwan University, 71 Chou-Shan Rd., Taipei 106, Taiwan.

The Science of the Total Environment
|March 9, 2005
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a Bayesian and Monte Carlo method to quantify uncertainty in life cycle assessment (LCA). Incorporating quantitative uncertainty analysis improves decision-making for environmental impact assessments, like global warming potential.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Life cycle assessment of different pre-treatment methods for silicon solar panel recycling.

Waste management (New York, N.Y.)·2026
Same author

From conceptual site models to data-driven insights: Key controls on vapor extraction performance in dual-phase extraction systems.

Journal of environmental management·2026
Same author

Graphene oxide-modified biochar & rainwater (O<sub>2</sub>) nanobubbles enable multifunctional remediation of Cyromazine, BPA, DEHP, and DPB in contaminated agricultural soil.

The Science of the total environment·2025
Same author

Exploring the synergy of CO<sub>2</sub> nanobubbles and biochar as a hydroponic substrate for enhanced carbon and nutrient utilization with a comprehensive health risk assessment.

Journal of environmental management·2025
Same author

Valorization of solid digestate through biochar production for toluene adsorption and enhanced energy recovery as solid recovered fuel.

Waste management (New York, N.Y.)·2025
Same author

Challenges and contribution of electrochemical driven by-products in tannery wastewater treatment: Optimization, detection and distribution of reactive oxidation species.

Journal of environmental management·2025

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Science
  • Environmental Engineering
  • Risk Assessment

Background:

  • Traditional life cycle assessment (LCA) lacks quantitative uncertainty analysis, limiting the reliability of its results.
  • Understanding and quantifying uncertainty is crucial for accurate environmental impact assessments and informed decision-making.
  • Previous LCA methods often provide deterministic results, failing to capture the full range of potential outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and apply a quantitative uncertainty analysis method for LCA results.
  • To compare alternative waste treatment options using global warming potential (GWP) as a metric.
  • To demonstrate how Bayesian methods and Monte Carlo simulations can improve LCA reliability.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a Bayesian approach combined with Monte Carlo simulations to quantify and update uncertainty in LCA.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Employed expert judgment (IPCC guideline) for prior parameter distributions and updated them with national statistics and site-specific data.
  • Performed Monte Carlo simulations using posterior parameter probability distributions to generate posterior uncertainty distributions for LCA results.

    • Main Results:

    • Quantitative uncertainty analysis in LCA provides more comprehensive information than deterministic methods, potentially altering decisions.
    • Correlation coefficient calculations identified key parameters significantly influencing LCA outcomes.
    • Updating prior uncertainty distributions with empirical data (national statistics, site-specific data) effectively reduced the overall uncertainty.

    Conclusions:

    • The integrated Bayesian and Monte Carlo approach enhances the reliability and informativeness of LCA.
    • Quantitative uncertainty analysis leads to better-informed decisions by providing a clearer comparison of environmental options.
    • Reducing uncertainty through data updates allows for more robust environmental impact assessments and strategic planning.